首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: does the pump influence outcome?
【24h】

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: does the pump influence outcome?

机译:体外循环泵与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术:泵会影响预后吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: This study assessed hospitalization outcome differences for patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting compared with patients having coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a nested case-control study from an 8-year, hospitalization cohort (n = 7,905) in which the data were collected prospectively. Inclusion criteria included a coronary artery bypass graft only and age greater than 18 years. Cases were patients undergoing OPCAB (n = 360) and controls were patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 1,080). Cases were matched to controls 1:3 on five variables: age (+/- 3 years), gender, diabetes, New York Heart Association Functional Classification, and surgical year (+/- 3 years). The 13 outcomes of interest were mortality, length of hospitalization, ICU length of stay, return to ICU, ventilator time, intraoperative complications, pulmonary complications, neurologic complications, renal complications, gastrointestinal complications, sternal wound infections, highest postoperative creatine kinase level, and units of blood products given during the procedure. Using logistic regression we controlled for eight confounding variables. RESULTS: Patients undergoing OPCAB had a significantly shorter length of hospitalization (relative risk [RR] = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99%), fewer pulmonary complications (RR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88%), fewer intraoperative complications (RR = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.0048-0.31%) fewer blood product units given (RR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.42%) and lower postoperative creatine kinase (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99%). There were no considerable differences for the remaining nine outcomes, including mortality and neurologic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing OPCAB had a considerably shorter length of hospitalization, had fewer pulmonary and intraoperative complications, and received a lower volume of blood products.
机译:背景:这项研究评估了接受非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)移植的患者与进行冠状动脉搭桥术与体外循环的患者相比的住院结局差异。研究设计:我们从一个为期8年的住院队列(n = 7,905)中进行了一项嵌套病例对照研究,在该研究中前瞻性收集了数据。纳入标准仅包括冠状动脉搭桥术,年龄大于18岁。病例为接受OPCAB的患者(n = 360),对照组为接受冠状动脉旁路移植术并进行心肺旁路移植的患者(n = 1,080)。病例在五个变量上与对照1:3匹配:年龄(+/- 3岁),性别,糖尿病,纽约心脏协会功能分类和手术年限(+/- 3岁)。感兴趣的13个结果是死亡率,住院时间,ICU住院时间,重返ICU,呼吸机时间,术中并发症,肺部并发症,神经系统并发症,肾脏并发症,胃肠道并发症,胸骨伤口感染,术后肌酸激酶水平最高和程序中给定的血液制品单位。使用逻辑回归,我们控制了八个混杂变量。结果:接受OPCAB的患者住院时间明显缩短(相对危险度[RR] = 0.95; 95%CI,0.91-0.99%),更少的肺部并发症(RR = 0.45; 95%CI,0.22-0.88%),更少术中并发症(RR = 0.04; 95%CI,0.0048-0.31%)给予的血液单位减少(RR = 0.31; 95%CI,0.14-0.42%),术后肌酸激酶降低(RR = 0.99; 95%CI,0.98) -0.99%)。其余九种结局,包括死亡率和神经系统并发症,没有显着差异。结论:接受OPCAB治疗的患者住院时间明显缩短,肺部和术中并发症减少,血液制品量减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号