首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Mortality prediction of head Abbreviated Injury Score and Glasgow Coma Scale: analysis of 7,764 head injuries.
【24h】

Mortality prediction of head Abbreviated Injury Score and Glasgow Coma Scale: analysis of 7,764 head injuries.

机译:头部缩窄得分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表的死亡率预测:分析7,764例颅脑损伤。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: We assessed the prognostic value and limitations of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and head Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) and correlated head AIS with GCS. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 7,764 patients with head injuries. Bivariate analysis was performed to examine the relationship of GCS, head AIS, age, gender, and mechanism of injury with mortality. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: The overall mortality in the group of head injury patients with no other major extracranial injuries and no hypotension on admission was 9.3%. Logistic regression analysis identified head AIS, GCS, age, and mechanism of injury as significant independent risk factors of death. The prognostic value of GCS and head AIS was significantly affected by the mechanism of injury and the age of the patient. Patients with similar GCS or head AIS but different mechanisms of injury or ages had significantly different outcomes. The adjusted odds ratio of death in penetrating trauma was 5.2 (3.9, 7.0), p < 0.0001, and in the age group > or = 55 years the adjusted odds ratio was 3.4 (2.6, 4.6), p < 0.0001. There was no correlation between head AIS and GCS (correlation coefficient -0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanism of injury and age have a major effect in the predictive value of GCS and head AIS. There is no good correlation between GCS and head AIS.
机译:摘要背景:我们评估了格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和头部缩写损伤评分(AIS)的预后价值和局限性,并将头部AIS与GCS相关联。研究设计:我们研究了7,764名头部受伤的患者。进行双变量分析以检查GCS,头部AIS,年龄,性别以及损伤与死亡率的关系。使用逐步逻辑回归分析来确定与死亡率相关的独立危险因素。结果:无其他重大颅外损伤且入院时无低血压的颅脑损伤患者的总死亡率为9.3%。 Logistic回归分析确定头部AIS,GCS,年龄和损伤机制是重要的独立死亡危险因素。 GCS和头部AIS的预后价值受到损伤机制和患者年龄的显着影响。 GCS相似或头部AIS但损伤机制或年龄不同的患者预后明显不同。穿透性创伤的死亡率调整后的优势比为5.2(3.9,7.0),p <0.0001,年龄大于或等于55岁的年龄组,校正后的优势比为3.4(2.6,4.6),p <0.0001。头部AIS与GCS之间没有相关性(相关系数-0.31)。结论:损伤和年龄的机制对GCS和头部AIS的预测价值有重要影响。 GCS与主管AIS之间没有良好的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号