...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR >Increased fluoroscopy time for central venous catheter placement by radiology residents versus staff radiologists
【24h】

Increased fluoroscopy time for central venous catheter placement by radiology residents versus staff radiologists

机译:与放射科医师相比,放射科住院医师在中央静脉导管放置上的透视时间增加了

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate differences in interventional radiology procedural fluoroscopy time (FT) for radiology residents versus staff radiologists, using central venous catheter (CVC) placement as an index service. Methods: To minimize interservice and complexity variables, stand-alone temporary internal jugular CVC procedures were targeted for analysis. Reports and images from 1,067 temporary CVC services from 2 hospitals over 2 years were reviewed as part of a quality improvement initiative. Insertion site, catheter type (eg, smaller triple lumen versus larger hemodialysis), resident identifier, staff identifier, and documented FT were compiled and analyzed. Results: Applying clinical (eg, concomitant venous angioplasty) and anatomic (eg, femoral access) exclusions, 537 cases with complete CVC procedure records were available for analysis. Radiology residents and staff radiologists were primary operators in 128 and 409 procedures, respectively. Distribution of resident procedures (82% right, 66% large lumen) was similar to that of staff (79% right, 63% large lumen). Mean FT of resident services was twice as long as that of staff services (1.24 minutes versus 0.63 minutes, P <.0001). Resident FT was independent of supervising staff radiologist. Increasing years of training for residents did not significantly reduce FT. Conclusions: When CVCs are placed by radiology residents, FT is double that for identical procedures performed by staff radiologists. Similar discrepancies likely exist for other interventional radiologic procedures. Residency training programs should initiate measures to monitor and manage fluoroscopy during interventional procedures to minimize radiation dose to patients, trainees, and other staff.
机译:目的:使用中央静脉导管(CVC)放置作为指标服务,以评估放射科住院医师与放射线放射科医师在介入放射学程序性荧光检查时间(FT)上的差异。方法:为了最大程度地减少服务间和复杂性变量,分析的目标是独立的临时内部颈静脉CVC程序。作为质量改进计划的一部分,对来自2家医院的1067个临时CVC服务在两年内的报告和图像进行了审核。编译并分析了插入部位,导管类型(例如,较小的三腔管腔与较大的血液透析管),居民标识符,人员标识符以及已记录的FT。结果:应用临床(例如,伴随静脉血管成形术)和解剖学(例如,股骨入路)排除,有537例具有完整CVC手术记录的病例可供分析。放射科住院医师和放射放射科医师分别是128和409程序的主要操作者。住院程序的分布(正确率82%,大管腔66%)与工作人员(正确率79%,大管腔63%)相似。居民服务的平均FT是员工服务的FT的两倍(1.24分钟对0.63分钟,P <.0001)。居民FT独立于放射放射医生的监督。为居民增加培训时间并没有显着降低金融时报。结论:当放射科医师放置CVC时,FT值是放射线医生执行相同程序的两倍。其他介入放射学程序可能存在相似的差异。住院医师培训计划应在介入治疗过程中采取措施监测和管理荧光检查,以最大程度地减少对患者,受训者和其他员工的辐射剂量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号