...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Roles of the left atrial roof and pulmonary veins in the anatomic substrate for persistent atrial fibrillation and ablation in a canine model
【24h】

Roles of the left atrial roof and pulmonary veins in the anatomic substrate for persistent atrial fibrillation and ablation in a canine model

机译:左房顶和肺静脉在解剖模型中对犬模型持续性心房纤颤和消融的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives The aim of this study was to establish the electrophysiological consequences of pulmonary vein encircling ablation (PVEA) and linear left atrial roof ablation (LARA) for the atrial fibrillation (AF) substrate in an experimental model. Background Sequential application of ablation lesions is often used in the management of AF, almost always incorporating PVEA and LARA. Methods Atrial tachypacing (400 beats/min, 5 weeks) was used to create an AF substrate in 13 dogs. PVEA and LARA were applied in randomized order. Regional atrial refractoriness, AF vulnerability, AF duration, and activation during AF were assessed before and after applying ablation lesion sets. Results PVEA failed to terminate AF or affect AF duration (742 ± 242 s before vs. 627 ± 227 s after PVEA) but decreased AF vulnerability to single extrastimuli from 91 ± 4% to 59 ± 5% (p < 0.001) by increasing effective refractory periods at sites with suppressed AF induction (from 78 ± 4 ms to 102 ± 8 ms, p < 0.01). LARA terminated AF in 67% of dogs (p < 0.05 vs. PVEA) and reduced AF duration (from 934 ± 232 s to 322 ± 183 s, p < 0.01) without affecting AF vulnerability. Baseline AF mapping showed left atrial (LA)-dominant complex reactivations (LA 9.4 ± 0.9 vs. right atrial 1.1 ± 0.3 reactivations/500-ms window, p < 0.001), with the LA roof frequently involved in re-entry circuits (44 ± 9% of LA reactivations). LARA terminated AF by interrupting LA roof reactivation circuits. In 5 of 13 cases, macrore-entrant tachycardias (usually perimitral) occurred after LARA eliminated persistent AF. Conclusions Both PVEA and LARA had beneficial but limited actions in this canine model. LARA suppressed AF perpetuation by interrupting LA roof reactivation, without affecting AF vulnerability. PVEA suppressed AF initiation by prolonging regional effective refractory period but failed to affect the AF-perpetuating substrate. These findings indicate the need to systematically study individual stepwise components to refine AF ablation procedures.
机译:目的这项研究的目的是在实验模型中确定肺静脉环绕消融(PVEA)和线性左房顶消融(LARA)对心房纤颤(AF)基质的电生理后果。背景消融病变的顺序应用通常用于房颤的治疗,几乎总是合并PVEA和LARA。方法采用心动过速(400次/分,5周)在13只狗中产生AF底物。 PVEA和LARA以随机顺序应用。在应用消融病变组之前和之后,评估了局部房室难治性,房颤脆弱性,房颤持续时间以及房颤期间的激活。结果PVEA无法终止房颤或影响房颤持续时间(PVEA前为742±242 s,而PVEA后为627±227 s),但通过增加有效房颤,单次额外刺激的房颤脆弱性从91±4%降低至59±5%(p <0.001)房颤诱发受抑制部位的不应期(从78±4 ms到102±8 ms,p <0.01)。 LARA终止了67%的狗的房颤(相对于PVEA,p <0.05),并且房颤持续时间从934±232 s减少到322±183 s,p <0.01),而不会影响房颤的脆弱性。基线AF测绘显示左心房(LA)占主导的复合物重新激活(LA 9.4±0.9 vs.右心房1.1±0.3重新激活/ 500-ms窗口,p <0.001),其中LA顶经常参与重入回路(44 LA重新激活的±9%)。 LARA通过中断LA车顶重新激活电路来终止AF。在13例中的5例中,LARA消除了持续性房颤后出现了大肠速动(通常为周围性)。结论PVEA和LARA在这种犬模型中均具有有益但有限的作用。 LARA通过中断LA屋顶的重新激活来抑制AF永存,而不影响AF的脆弱性。 PVEA通过延长局部有效不应期来抑制房颤的发生,但未能影响房颤永久性基质。这些发现表明需要系统地研究各个逐步成分以完善房颤消融程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号