首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Outcomes following pre-operative clopidogrel administration in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial.
【24h】

Outcomes following pre-operative clopidogrel administration in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial.

机译:在接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的急性冠脉综合征患者术前服用氯吡格雷后的结果:ACUITY(急性导管插入和紧急干预分类策略)试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of upstream clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial. BACKGROUND: Despite benefits of clopidogrel in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, this agent is often not administered upstream (before angiography) as recommended by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines because of potential bleeding in the minority of patients who require CABG. METHODS: The ACUITY trial enrolled 13,819 patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing early invasive management. The timing of clopidogrel initiation was per investigator discretion. A 5-day washout period before CABG was recommended for patients having received clopidogrel. RESULTS: Of 13,819 patients enrolled, 1,539 (11.1%) underwent CABG before discharge. Clopidogrel-exposed patients had a longer median duration of hospitalization (12.0 days vs. 8.9 days, p < 0.0001), but fewer adverse composite ischemic events (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization) at 30 days; 12.7% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.01), with nonsignificantly different rates of non-CABG-related major bleeding (3.4% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.87) and post-CABG major bleeding (50.3% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.83) compared with those patients not administered clopidogrel. By multivariable analysis, clopidogrel use before CABG was an independent predictor of reduced 30-day composite ischemia (odds ratio: 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.48 to 0.92, p = 0.001) but not of increased post-CABG major bleeding (odds ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 1.19, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel administration before catheterization in patients with NSTE-ACS requiring CABG is associated with significantly fewer 30-day adverse ischemic events without significantly increasing major bleeding, compared to withholding clopidogrel until after angiography. These findings support the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for upstream clopidogrel administration in all NSTE-ACS patients, including those who subsequently undergo CABG. (Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes [ACS]; NCT00093158).
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估上游氯吡格雷对需要进行ACUITY(急性导管插入和紧急干预分类策略)试验的非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)需要冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的患者的影响。背景:尽管氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的NSTE-ACS患者有益,但由于少数患者潜在的出血,根据美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南的建议,通常不向上游(血管造影之前)施用这种药物谁需要CABG。方法:ACUITY试验招募了13819例接受早期侵入性治疗的NSTE-ACS患者。氯吡格雷开始的时机由研究者自行决定。对于接受氯吡格雷的患者,建议在CABG前5天的清除期。结果:在13819例患者中,有1539例(11.1%)在出院前接受了CABG检查。暴露于氯吡格雷的患者中位住院时间较长(12.0天比8.9天,p <0.0001),但在30天的复合不良缺血事件(死亡,心肌梗塞或计划外血运重建)较少; 12.7%vs. 17.3%,p = 0.01),非CABG相关的大出血发生率(3.4%vs. 3.2%,p = 0.87)和CABG后的大出血发生率(50.3%vs. 50.9%)无显着差异, p = 0.83)与未服用氯吡格雷的患者相比。通过多变量分析,CABG之前使用氯吡格雷是30天复合缺血减少的独立预测因子(几率:0.67,95%置信区间:0.48至0.92,p = 0.001),但不是CABG后大出血增加的几率(几率) :0.98,95%置信区间:0.80至1.19,p = 0.80)。结论:相比于在血管造影后才停用氯吡格雷,需要CABG的NSTE-ACS患者在导管插入前服用氯吡格雷与30天的不良缺血事件明显相关,而不会显着增加大出血。这些发现支持美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会针对所有NSTE-ACS患者(包括随后接受CABG的患者)进行上游氯吡格雷治疗的指南。 (在急性冠状动脉综合征中血管生成素与肝素的比较[ACS]; NCT00093158)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号