...
首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions >Outcomes of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and acute coronary syndromes: Analysis from the acuity (Acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy) trial
【24h】

Outcomes of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and acute coronary syndromes: Analysis from the acuity (Acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy) trial

机译:先前有冠状动脉搭桥术和急性冠状动脉综合征的患者的结局:急性(急性导管插入和紧急干预分类策略)试验的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This study sought to assess the contemporary outcomes of patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) who present with moderate and high-risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and are treated with an early invasive strategy and contemporary antithrombin regimens. Background: The prognosis of patients with ACS and prior CABG in relation to triage strategy and contemporary antithrombotic regimens is unknown. Methods: In the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial, 2,475 of 13,764 patients (18.0%) with ACS managed with an early invasive strategy had previously undergone CABG. Their outcomes were examined according to treatment and randomized antithrombin regimen. Results: Prior CABG was associated with older age, more frequent comorbidities, higher Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with versus without prior CABG were less likely to undergo (repeat) CABG and were more likely to be managed medically. At 1 year, patients with versus without prior CABG had higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (22.5% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.0001) due to greater mortality (5.4% vs. 3.9%, p < 0.0001), myocardial infarction (10.0% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.0001), and unplanned revascularization (13.1% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.0001). History of CABG was an independent predictor of MACE. The 1-year MACE rates were not significantly different after randomization to bivalirudin versus heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (odds ratio: 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.90 to 1.70). Conclusions: Despite the progress in the treatment of coronary artery disease, patients with prior CABG and ACS have a poor prognosis, substantially worse than for those without prior CABG. Whereas bivalirudin monotherapy was an acceptable treatment for these patients, it did not improve their prognoses.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估具有中度和高危急性冠脉综合征(ACS)并接受早期侵入性策略和当代抗凝血酶治疗的既往冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)患者的当代疗效。背景:ACS和既往CABG患者的分流策略和现代抗栓治疗方案的预后尚不清楚。方法:在ACUITY(急性导管插入和紧急干预分类策略)试验中,在采用早期侵入性策略管理的13,764例ACS患者中,有2,475例曾接受过CABG。根据治疗和随机抗凝血酶方案检查其结局。结果:先前的CABG与年龄更大,合并症频率更高,心肌梗塞溶栓危险性评分较高和左室射血分数降低有关。患有或未患有既往CABG的患者接受(重复)CABG的可能性较小,并且接受医疗管理的可能性更高。在1年时,有或没有CABG的患者由于较高的死亡率而导致重大不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率较高(22.5%比15.2%,p <0.0001),(5.4%vs. 3.9%,p <0.0001),心肌梗塞(10.0%vs. 6.8%,p <0.0001)和计划外血运重建(13.1%vs. 8.2%,p <0.0001)。 CABG的历史是MACE的独立预测因子。随机分配给比伐卢定与肝素加糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂的1年期MACE率无显着差异(优势比:1.24,95%置信区间:0.90至1.70)。结论:尽管在冠状动脉疾病的治疗方面取得了进展,但既往患有CABG和ACS的患者预后较差,远比未接受CABG的患者差。尽管比伐卢定单药治疗对于这些患者来说是可以接受的治疗方法,但并不能改善他们的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号