...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses.
【24h】

Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses.

机译:主动脉生物瓣膜患者最大程度运动时的血流动力学和身体机能:无支架与带支架生物假体的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare stentless bioprostheses with stented bioprostheses with regard to their hemodynamic behavior during exercise. BACKGROUND: Stentless aortic bioprostheses have better hemodynamic performances at rest than stented bioprostheses, but very few comparisons were performed during exercise. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with normally functioning stentless (n = 19) or stented (n = 19) bioprostheses were submitted to a maximal ramp upright bicycle exercise test. Valve effective orifice area and mean transvalvular pressure gradient at rest and during peak exercise were successfully measured using Doppler echocardiography in 30 of the 38 patients. RESULTS: At peak exercise, the mean gradient increased significantly less in stentless than in stented bioprostheses (+5 +/- 3 vs. +12 +/- 8 mm Hg; p = 0.002) despite similar increases in mean flow rates (+137 +/- 58 vs. +125 +/- 65 ml/s; p = 0.58); valve area also increased but with no significant difference between groups. Despite this hemodynamic difference, exercise capacity was not significantly different, but left ventricular (LV) mass and function were closer to normal in stentless bioprostheses. Overall, there was a strong inverse relation between the mean gradient during peak exercise and the indexed valve area at rest (r = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamics during exercise are better in stentless than stented bioprostheses due to the larger resting indexed valve area of stentless bioprostheses. This is associated with beneficial effects with regard to LV mass and function. The relation found between the resting indexed valve area and the gradient during exercise can be used to project the hemodynamic behavior of these bioprostheses at the time of operation. It should thus be useful to select the optimal prosthesis given the patient's body surface area and level of physical activity.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较无支架生物假体与带支架生物假体在运动过程中的血液动力学行为。背景:无支架的主动脉生物假体在静止时的血流动力学性能优于带支架的生物假体,但在运动过程中进行的比较很少。方法:38例功能正常的无支架生物假体(n = 19)或带支架生物假体(n = 19)的患者接受了最大坡度直立式自行车运动测试。使用多普勒超声心动图在38例患者中的30例中成功测量了静息时和运动高峰时的瓣膜有效孔面积和平均经瓣膜压力梯度。结果:在峰值运动时,无支架的平均梯度增加明显少于带支架的生物假体(+5 +/- 3 vs. +12 +/- 8 mm Hg; p = 0.002),尽管平均流速有所增加(+137) +/- 58与+125 +/- 65 ml / s; p = 0.58);瓣膜面积也增加,但组间无显着差异。尽管存在这种血液动力学差异,但运动能力并无显着差异,但无支架生物假体的左心室(LV)质量和功能更接近正常。总体而言,高峰运动期间的平均梯度与静止时分度的瓣膜面积之间存在很强的反比关系(r = 0.90)。结论:无支架生物假体的运动时血流动力学优于无支架生物假体,这是因为无支架生物假体的静息索引瓣膜面积更大。这与关于LV质量和功能的有益作用有关。在运动过程中,静止的分度瓣膜面积与梯度之间的关系可以用来预测这些生物假体在手术时的血液动力学行为。因此,考虑到患者的体表面积和身体活动水平,选择最佳的假体应该是有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号