...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >The ABCD (Alternans Before Cardioverter Defibrillator) Trial: strategies using T-wave alternans to improve efficiency of sudden cardiac death prevention.
【24h】

The ABCD (Alternans Before Cardioverter Defibrillator) Trial: strategies using T-wave alternans to improve efficiency of sudden cardiac death prevention.

机译:ABCD(心脏复律除颤器之前的替代品)试验:使用T波交替蛋白提高心脏猝死预防效率的策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Because risk stratification with electrophysiological study (EPS) improves efficiency but is invasive, we sought to determine whether noninvasive microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) testing could identify patients who benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) as well as EPS. BACKGROUND: Prevention of sudden cardiac death on the basis of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) alone is inefficient, because most ICDs never deliver therapy. METHODS: The ABCD (Alternans Before Cardioverter Defibrillator) trial is a multicenter prospective study that enrolled patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF < or =0.40) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. All patients underwent MTWA and EPS. ICDs were mandated if either test was positive. RESULTS: Of 566 patients followed for a median of 1.9 years, 39 (7.5%) met the primary end point of appropriate ICD discharge or sudden death at 1 year. As hypothesized, primary analysis showed that MTWA achieved 1-year positive (9%) and negative (95%) predictive values that were comparable to EPS (11% and 95%, respectively). In addition, secondary analysis showed that at the pre-specified 1-year end point, event rates were significantly higher in patients with both a positive MTWA-directed strategy (hazard ratio: 2.1, p = 0.03) and a positive EPS-directed strategy (hazard ratio: 2.4, p = 0.007). Moreover, the event rate in patients with both negative MTWA test and EPS was lower than in those with 2 positive tests (2% vs. 12%; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The ABCD study is the first trial to use MTWA to guide prophylactic ICD insertion. Risk stratification strategies using noninvasive MTWA versus invasive EPS are comparable at 1 year and complementary when applied in combination. Strategies employing MTWA, EPS, or both might identify subsets of patients least likely to benefit from ICD insertion. (Study to Compare TWA Test and EPS Test for Predicting Patients at Risk for Life-Threatening Heart Rhythms [ABCD Study]; NCT00187291).
机译:目的:由于通过电生理研究(EPS)进行风险分层可提高效率但具有侵入性,因此我们试图确定非侵入性微伏T波交联剂(MTWA)测试能否确定可从植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)和EPS中受益的患者。背景:仅凭左心室射血分数(LVEF)预防心源性猝死是无效的,因为大多数ICD从未提供治疗。方法:ABCD(心脏跳动除颤器前的Alternans)试验是一项多中心前瞻性研究,纳入了缺血性心肌病(LVEF <或= 0.40)和非持续性室性心动过速的患者。所有患者均接受MTWA和EPS。如果其中一项测试呈阳性,则要求ICD。结果:566例患者接受了平均1.9年的随访,其中39例(7.5%)达到了ICD适当出院或1年猝死的主要终点。如假设的那样,主要分析表明,MTWA达到了与EPS相当的1年阳性(9%)和阴性(95%)预测值(分别为11%和95%)。此外,二次分析显示,在预先指定的1年终点时,MTWA导向策略为阳性(危险比:2.1,p = 0.03)和EPS导向策略为阳性的患者的事件发生率均显着较高。 (危险比:2.4,p = 0.007)。此外,MTWA试验和EPS阴性的患者的事件发生率均低于2例阳性的患者(2%比12%; p = 0.017)。结论:ABCD研究是首次使用MTWA指导预防性ICD插入的试验。使用无创MTWA与有创EPS进行的风险分层策略在1年时具有可比性,并且在组合应用时可以互补。采用MTWA和/或EPS的策略可能会确定最不可能从ICD插入中受益的患者子集。 (比较TWA测试和EPS测试以预测可能危及生命的心律失常的患者的研究[ABCD研究]; NCT00187291)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号