...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >5-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation insights from a patient-level pooled analysis of 4 randomized trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents.
【24h】

5-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation insights from a patient-level pooled analysis of 4 randomized trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents.

机译:西罗莫司洗脱支架植入后的5年临床结果来自对4项随机试验比较西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架的患者水平的汇总分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Five-year clinical follow-up has been scheduled per protocol by the 4 Cypher (Cordis/Johnson & Johnson, Warren, New Jersey) sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus bare-metal stent (BMS) randomized trials. BACKGROUND: A delayed arterial healing response after drug-eluting stent implantation has raised concerns about the long-term safety of drug-eluting stents. METHODS: In a pooled analysis of 4 randomized trials, 1,748 patients were assigned to receive either an SES (n = 878) or BMS (n = 870). RESULTS: At 5 years, there was no significant difference in the rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or the composite of death/MI between the 2 groups (15.1% in the SES group vs. 13.6% in the BMS group; p = 0.36). The 5-year incidence of stent thrombosis by the Academic Research Consortium definition did not differ between SES and BMS (definite/probable stent thrombosis, 2.1% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.99). The incidence of very late stent thrombosis was also similar between the SES and BMS groups (1.4% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.22). The annualized rates of definite/probable stent thrombosis after 1 year were 0.4% for SES and 0.2% for BMS. The 5-year incidence of target vessel revascularization was significantly lower in the SES group (15.2% vs. 30.1%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this patient-level pooled analysis, overall use of SES compared with BMS demonstrated persistent superior efficacy at 5 years in terms of a reduction in target vessel revascularization, without an increase in rates of death, MI, or stent thrombosis. (The Initial Double-Blind Drug-Eluting Stent vs Bare-Metal Stent Study, NCT00233805; The Study of the BX Velocity Stent in the Treatment of De Novo Artery Lesions, NCT00381420; Study of Sirolimus-Coated BX VELOCITY Balloon-Expandable Stent in Treatment of de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions [SIRIUS], NCT00232765; The Study of the BX VELOCITY Stent In Patients With De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions, NCT00235144).
机译:目的:根据4方案(Cordis / Johnson&Johnson,新泽西州沃伦市)西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)与裸金属支架(BMS)的随机试验,已计划按五年方案进行临床随访。背景:药物洗脱支架植入后的延迟动脉愈合反应引起了人们对药物洗脱支架长期安全性的担忧。方法:在对4项随机试验的汇总分析中,将1,748例患者分配为接受SES(n = 878)或BMS(n = 870)。结果:在5年时,两组的死亡率,心肌梗塞(MI)或死亡率/ MI的复合率无显着差异(SES组为15.1%,BMS组为13.6%; p = 0.36)。根据学术研究协会的定义,SES和BMS在5年内发生支架血栓的发生率没有差异(确切/可能的支架血栓发生率为2.1%vs. 2.0%; p = 0.99)。在SES组和BMS组之间,晚期支架血栓形成的发生率也相似(1.4%对0.7%; p = 0.22)。 1年后,SES的固定/可能支架血栓形成的年化率为0.4%,BMS为0.2%。在SES组中,目标血管血运重建的5年发生率显着降低(15.2%对30.1%; p <0.0001)。结论:在此患者水平的汇总分析中,与BMS相比,SES的整体使用在降低目标血管血运重建方面显示了5年持续的优越疗效,而没有增加死亡率,MI或支架血栓形成。 (最初的双盲药物洗脱支架vs裸金属支架研究,NCT00233805;治疗新生血管病变的BX速度支架的研究,NCT00381420;西罗莫司涂层BX VELOCITY球囊扩张支架治疗的研究冠状动脉天然病变的研究[SIRIUS],NCT00232765;患有冠状动脉病变的BX速度支架的研究,NCT00235144。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号