...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry.
【24h】

Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry.

机译:西罗莫司洗脱支架置入后在急性冠脉综合征患者中的早期结果:在鹿特丹心脏病医院(RESEARCH)注册处评估雷帕霉素洗脱支架的见解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the early outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). BACKGROUND: The safety of SES implantation in patients with a high risk for early thrombotic complications is currently unknown. METHODS: Sirolimus-eluting stents have been utilized as the device of choice for all percutaneous procedures in our institution, as part of the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. After four months of enrollment, 198 patients with ACS had been treated exclusively with SES (64% of those treated in the period) and were compared with a control group composed of 301 consecutive patients treated with bare stents in the same time period immediately before this study. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the first month was evaluated (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], or re-intervention). RESULTS: Compared with control patients, patients treated with SES had more primary angioplasty (95% vs. 77%; p < 0.01), more bifurcation stenting (13% vs. 5%; p < 0.01), less previous MI (28% vs. 45%; p < 0.01), and less glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor utilization (27% vs. 42%; p < 0.01). The 30-day MACE rate was similar between both groups (SES 6.1% vs. control patients 6.6%; p = 0.8), with most complications occurring during the first week. Stent thrombosis occurred in 0.5% of SES patients and in 1.7% of control patients (p = 0.4). In multivariate analysis, SES utilization did not influence the incidence of MACE (odds ratio 1.0 [95% confidence interval: 0.4 to 2.2]; p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for patients with ACS is safe, with early outcomes comparable with bare metal stents.
机译:目的:本研究评估了西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)治疗的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的早期结局。背景:目前尚不清楚在早期血栓并发症高风险患者中进行SES植入的安全性。方法:作为我们机构中所有经皮手术的选择设备,西罗莫司洗脱支架已被用作鹿特丹心脏病医院(RESEARCH)注册评估的雷帕霉素洗脱支架的一部分。入组四个月后,对198例ACS患者进行了SES专门治疗(占同期患者的64%),并与对照组301人组成的对照组进行比较,该对照组由301例在同一时间段之前接受裸支架治疗的连续患者组成研究。评估第一个月的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率(死亡,非致命性心肌梗塞[MI]或再次干预)。结果:与对照组相比,接受SES治疗的患者的原发性血管成形术较多(95%比77%; p <0.01),分叉支架置入较多(13%vs. 5%; p <0.01),既往MI较少(28%) vs. 45%; p <0.01)和更少的糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂利用率(27%vs. 42%; p <0.01)。两组的30天MACE发生率相似(SES 6.1%,对照患者6.6%; p = 0.8),大多数并发症发生在第一周。 0.5%的SES患者和1.7%的对照患者发生支架血栓形成(p = 0.4)。在多变量分析中,SES利用率不影响MACE发生率(几率1.0 [95%置信区间:0.4至2.2]; p = 0.97)。结论:西罗莫司洗脱支架用于ACS患者是安全的,早期结果与裸金属支架相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号