首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Comparison of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: A longitudinal study of echocardiography parameters in cohort a of the PARTNER trial (Placement of aortic transcatheter valves)
【24h】

Comparison of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: A longitudinal study of echocardiography parameters in cohort a of the PARTNER trial (Placement of aortic transcatheter valves)

机译:严重主动脉瓣狭窄中经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:PARTNER试验队列中的超声心动图参数的纵向研究(主动脉经导管瓣膜的放置)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives This study sought to compare echocardiographic findings in patients with critical aortic stenosis following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background The PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial randomized patients 1:1 to SAVR or TAVR. Methods Echocardiograms were obtained at baseline, discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the procedure and analyzed in a core laboratory. For the analysis of post-implantation variables, the first interpretable study (≤6 months) was used. Results Both groups showed a decrease in aortic valve gradients and increase in effective orifice area (EOA) (p < 0.0001), which remained stable over 2 years. Compared with SAVR, TAVR resulted in larger indexed EOA (p = 0.038), less prosthesis-patient mismatch (p = 0.019), and more total and paravalvular aortic regurgitation (p < 0.0001). Baseline echocardiographic univariate predictors of death were lower peak transaortic gradient in TAVR patients, and low left ventricular diastolic volume, low stroke volume, and greater severity of mitral regurgitation in SAVR patients. Post-implantation echocardiographic univariate predictors of death were: larger left ventricular diastolic volume, left ventricular systolic volume and EOA, decreased ejection fraction, and greater aortic regurgitation in TAVR patients; and smaller left ventricular systolic and diastolic volumes, low stroke volume, smaller EOA, and prosthesis-patient mismatch in SAVR patients. Conclusions Patients randomized to either SAVR or TAVR experience enduring, significant reductions in transaortic gradients and increase in EOA. Compared with SAVR, TAVR patients had higher indexed EOA, lower prosthesis-patient mismatch, and more aortic regurgitation. Univariate predictors of death for the TAVR and SAVR groups differed and might allow future refinement in patient selection. (THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial; NCT00530894).
机译:目的本研究旨在比较手术主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)或经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后有严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者的超声心动图检查结果。背景PARTNER(主动脉导管瓣膜放置)试验将1:1患者随机分配至SAVR或TAVR。方法在基线,出院,术后30天,6个月,1年和2年时获取超声心动图,并在核心实验室进行分析。为了分析植入后的变量,使用了第一个可解释的研究(≤6个月)。结果两组均显示主动脉瓣梯度降低,有效孔面积(EOA)增加(p <0.0001),并在2年内保持稳定。与SAVR相比,TAVR导致指数化的EOA更大(p = 0.038),假体-患者失配更少(p = 0.019),总的和瓣周主动脉反流更多(p <0.0001)。基线超声心动图死亡的单因素预测因素是TAVR患者的主动脉峰值降低,SAVR患者的左心室舒张压低,卒中量低和二尖瓣反流的严重性高。植入后超声心动图死亡的单因素预测因素是:TAVR患者左室舒张容积增加,左室收缩容积和EOA增大,射血分数降低和主动脉反流增加。 SAVR患者的左室收缩和舒张容量较小,中风量较小,EOA较小以及假体与患者不匹配。结论随机分配到SAVR或TAVR的患者会经历持久,经主动脉梯度明显降低和EOA升高的情况。与SAVR相比,TAVR患者的EOA指数更高,假体-患者失配率更低,主动脉瓣反流更多。 TAVR和SAVR组的单因素死亡预测因素有所不同,可能会在将来的患者选择中有所改进。 (合作伙伴试用:AoRTic TraNscathetER瓣膜试验的放置; NCT00530894)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号