首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Commentary: The Ongoing Debate Between 'Femoralists' and 'Radialists' Should There Be a Default Strategy?
【24h】

Commentary: The Ongoing Debate Between 'Femoralists' and 'Radialists' Should There Be a Default Strategy?

机译:评论:“铁腕主义者”和“径向主义者”之间的争论正在进行中,是否应该采取默认策略?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As more complex invasive procedures are performed in patients with increasing comorbidities, there is a compelling need to develop approaches to make these procedures safer (for patient and operator), more efficient, and more comfortable. Improvements in equipment, modifications in adjunctive therapies, and enhanced imaging have improved outcomes and have reduced complications associated with the invasive nature of coronary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Arguably, the adoption of transradial access (TRA) has been 1 of the principal advancements in this quest.
机译:随着合并症患者中执行更复杂的侵入性手术,迫切需要开发使这些手术更安全(对患者和操作者而言),更有效和更舒适的方法。设备的改进,辅助疗法的改进以及增强的成像技术改善了结局,并减少了与冠状动脉诊断和治疗程序的侵入性相关的并发症。可以说,采用放射治疗是该研究的主要进展之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号