...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Assessment of flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and venous adenosine infusion before and after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting.
【24h】

Assessment of flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and venous adenosine infusion before and after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting.

机译:左前降支冠状动脉支架置入术前后通过胸腔多普勒超声心动图和静脉内腺苷输注评估流速储备。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) (the ratio between hyperemic and baseline peak flow velocity), as measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography during adenosine infusion, allows detection of flow changes in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) before and after stenting. BACKGROUND: The immediate post-stenting evaluation of CFR by intracoronary Doppler has shown mixed results, due to reactive hyperemia and microvascular stunning. Noninvasive coronary Doppler echocardiography may be a more reliable measure than intracoronary Doppler. METHODS: Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography during 90-s venous adenosine infusion (140 microg/kg body weight per min) was used to measure CFR of the LAD in 45 patients before and 3.7 +/- 2 days after successful stenting, as well as in 25 subjects with an angiographically normal LAD (control group). RESULTS: Adequate Doppler spectra were obtained in 96% of the patients. Pre-stent CFR was significantly lower in patients than in control subjects (diastolic CFR: 1.45 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.72 +/- 0.71, p < 0.01; systolic CFR: 1.61 +/- 1.02 vs. 2.41 +/- 0.68, p < 0.01) and increased toward the normal range after stenting (diastolic CFR: 2.58 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.72 +/- 0.75, p = NS; systolic CFR: 2.43 +/- 1.01 vs. 2.41 +/- 0.52, p = NS). Diastolic CFR was often damped, suggesting coronary steal in patients with > or =90% versus <90% LAD stenosis (0.86 +/- 0.23 vs. 1.69 +/- 0.43, p < 0.01). Coronary stenting normalized diastolic CFR in these two groups (2.45 +/- 0.77 and 2.64 +/- 0.69, respectively, p = NS), even though impaired diastolic CFR persisted in three of four patients with > or =90% stenosis. Stenosis of the LAD was better discriminated by diastolic (F = 49.30) than systolic (F = 12.20) CFR (both p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary flow reserve, as measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, is impaired in LAD disease; it may identify patients with > or =90% stenosis; and it normalizes early after stenting, even in patients with > or =90% stenosis.
机译:目的:我们试图评估腺苷输注期间经胸多普勒超声心动图测量的冠状动脉血流储备量(CFR)(充血和基线峰值血流速度之比)是否可以检测左冠状动脉前降支(LAD)的血流变化)置入支架前后。背景:由于反应性充血和微血管骤停,冠状动脉内多普勒对CFR的支架后立即评估显示出好坏参半。无创冠状动脉多普勒超声心动图检查可能比冠状动脉内多普勒检查更可靠。方法:在90例静脉腺苷输注(140微克/千克体重/分钟)期间,经胸多普勒超声心动图测量了45例患者在成功置入支架前和置入后3.7 +/- 2天的LAD的CFR。血管造影正常的LAD患者(对照组)。结果:96%的患者获得了足够的多普勒频谱。患者的支架前CFR显着低于对照组(舒张压CFR:1.45 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.72 +/- 0.71,p <0.01;收缩压CFR:1.61 +/- 1.02 vs. 2.41 +/- 0.68, p <0.01)并在支架置入后增加到正常范围(舒张压CFR:2.58 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.72 +/- 0.75,p = NS;收缩压CFR:2.43 +/- 1.01 vs.2.41 +/- 0.52,p = NS)。舒张压CFR通常被衰减,提示LAD狭窄≥90%或<90%的患者发生冠状动脉窃取(0.86 +/- 0.23 vs. 1.69 +/- 0.43,p <0.01)。两组冠状动脉支架置入术使舒张压CFR正常化(分别为2.45 +/- 0.77和2.64 +/- 0.69,p = NS),尽管狭窄程度≥90%的四名患者中舒张压CFR持续存在。 LAD狭窄由舒张期(F = 49.30)优于收缩期(F = 12.20)CFR(均p <0.01)。结论:经胸多普勒超声心动图测量的冠状动脉血流储备在LAD疾病中受损。它可以识别出狭窄≥90%的患者;即使在狭窄程度大于或等于90%的患者中,支架置入后也能早日恢复正常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号