首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during elective coronary revascularization: a meta-analysis of randomized trials performed in the era of stents and thienopyridines.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during elective coronary revascularization: a meta-analysis of randomized trials performed in the era of stents and thienopyridines.

机译:糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂在选择性冠状动脉血运重建过程中的功效和安全性:对在支架和噻吩并吡啶时代进行的随机试验的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Studies have documented that GPIs are useful during PCI; however, much of this research was conducted before the routine use of coronary stents and thienopyridines. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane clinical trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception for studies that randomly assigned patients undergoing elective PCI to a GPI versus control. Trials were included if stents and thienopyridines were used routinely and clinical outcomes were reported. Outcomes were assessed within 30 days. A DerSimonian-Laird model was used to construct random effects summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Our search yielded 22 studies with 10,123 patients. The incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction was 5.1% with GPI versus 8.3% with control (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.79, p < 0.0001). Major bleeding was 1.2% versus 0.9% (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.83 to 2.25, p = 0.22), minor bleeding was 3.0% versus 1.7% (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.28 to 2.26, p < 0.0001), and mortality was 0.3% versus 0.5% (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.33, p = 0.27), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the current era of elective PCI performed with stents and thienopyridines, GPIs provide clinical benefit. These agents reduce nonfatal myocardial infarction without a notable increase in major bleeding; however, they increase the risk of minor bleeding. All-cause mortality is not reduced.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是研究糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂(GPI)在选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间的疗效和安全性。背景:研究表明,GPI在PCI期间很有用。然而,许多研究是在常规使用冠状动脉支架和噻吩并吡啶之前进行的。方法:我们从一开始就搜索MEDLINE,Cochrane临床试验和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库,以进行研究,该研究将接受选择性PCI的患者随机分配为GPI与对照组。如果常规使用支架和噻吩并吡啶并报告临床结果,则包括试验。在30天内评估结果。 DerSimonian-Laird模型用于构建随机效应汇总风险比(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果:我们的搜索产生了22项研究,涉及10123例患者。非致命性心肌梗死的发生率在GPI组为5.1%,在对照组为8.3%(RR:0.66,95%CI:0.55至0.79,p <0.0001)。大出血为1.2%对0.9%(RR:1.37,95%CI:0.83至2.25,p = 0.22),小出血为3.0%对1.7%(RR:1.70,95%CI:1.28至2.26,p <0.0001 ),死亡率分别为0.3%和0.5%(RR:0.70、95%CI:0.36至1.33,p = 0.27)。结论:在目前使用支架和噻吩并吡啶类药物进行选择性PCI的时代,GPI提供了临床益处。这些药物可减少非致命性心肌梗塞,而不会增加大出血。但是,它们增加了轻微出血的风险。全因死亡率没有降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号