首页> 外文期刊>Clinical cardiology. >Efficacy and Safety of Unfractionated Heparin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Revascularization for an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials Performed With Stents and Thienopyridines
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Unfractionated Heparin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Revascularization for an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials Performed With Stents and Thienopyridines

机译:普通肝素加糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂在急性冠脉综合征血运重建过程中的功效和安全性:支架和噻吩并吡啶类药物随机试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background:Early studies of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) demonstrated benefit during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Since their introduction, the magnitude of benefit of GPIs has become unclear.Hypothesis:We hypothesized that adding a GPI to unfractionated heparin in ACS patients treated with stents and thienopyridines is beneficial.Methods:We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov databases for randomized clinical trials that studied the use of GPIs during ACS. We required that patients be randomly assigned to unfractionated heparin plus a GPI versus unfractionated heparin plus placebo (or control). Additional inclusion criteria included the use of coronary stents and periprocedural thienopyridines. Outcomes were assessed at 30 days. Random effects DerSimonian-Laird summary risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed.Results:Sixteen studies with 7611 patients were included. Myocardial infarction was 3.1% with GPI versus 4.4% with control (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.94, P = 0.014); revascularization, 1.7% versus 2.7% (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46–0.89, P = 0.008); major bleeding, 2.5% versus 2.1% (RR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.89–1.63, P = 0.22); minor bleeding, 5.5% versus 4.1% (RR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06–1.78, P = 0.016); and mortality, 2.2% versus 2.9% (RR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.59–1.06, P = 0.12), respectively.Conclusions:Among ACS patients treated with stents and thienopyridines, GPIs were associated with reduced myocardial infarction and revascularization. Minor, but not major bleeding was increased with GPIs. Mortality was similar between the groups. ? 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Supporting information may be found in the online version of this articleThis work was supported by an unrestricted grant from the Florida Heart Research Institute, which had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation, manuscript writing, or decision to proceed with publication.Anthony A Bavry has received research support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals and serves as a contractor for American College of Cardiology Cardiosource. The other authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
机译:背景:糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂(GPI)的早期研究表明,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)有好处。假设开始以来,我们尚不清楚GPIs的益处量。假设:我们假设,在经支架和噻吩并吡啶治疗的ACS患者中,向普通肝素中添加GPI是有益的。方法:我们检索了MEDLINE,Cochrane和Clinicaltrials.gov数据库用于研究ACS期间使用GPI的随机临床试验。我们要求患者随机分配普通肝素加GPI对比普通肝素加安慰剂(或对照)。其他纳入标准包括使用冠状动脉支架和围手术期噻吩并吡啶类药物。在30天评估结果。构建了DerSimonian-Laird汇总风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CIs)的随机效应。结果:纳入了16项研究,共7611例患者。 GPI组的心肌梗塞率为3.1%,而对照组为4.4%(RR = 0.74; 95%CI,0.59-0.94,P = 0.014)。血运重建率分别为1.7%和2.7%(RR = 0.64; 95%CI,0.46-0.89,P = 0.008);大出血,分别为2.5%和2.1%(RR = 1.21; 95%CI,0.89–1.63,P = 0.22);轻微出血,分别为5.5%和4.1%(RR = 1.37; 95%CI,1.06-1.78,P = 0.016);死亡率分别为2.2%和2.9%(RR = 0.79; 95%CI,0.59-1.06,P = 0.12)。结论:在接受支架和噻吩并吡啶治疗的ACS患者中,GPI与心肌梗塞和血管重建减少有关。 GPI增加了轻微但不严重的出血。两组之间的死亡率相似。 ? 2011 Wiley Periodicals,Inc.支持的信息可以在本文的在线版本中找到此工作得到佛罗里达心脏研究所的无限制资助,该研究在研究设计,数据收集,分析或解释,手稿中均不起作用Anthony A Bavry获得了诺华制药公司的研究支持,并担任了美国心脏病学会心源学会的承包商。其他作者没有资金,财务关系或利益冲突可供披露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号