首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM >Response: Re: Trends in physician house calls to medicare beneficiaries
【24h】

Response: Re: Trends in physician house calls to medicare beneficiaries

机译:回应:回复:医务室对医疗保险受益人的呼唤趋势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: As a relatively recent family medicine residency graduate, I experienced firsthand how the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) requirement of 2 house calls was usually fulfilled. I and most of my fellow residents made our house calls late in our third year, and the training consisted of being told where the "house call bag" was and to make sure we documented the visit. This was certainly not sufficient preparation for incorporating house calls into practice but rather "checking the box" so as to not incur ACGME citations. I agree with the author that a national house call curriculum for family medicine residencies would be a wonderful resource. There seemed to be momentum for strengthening geriatric training in family medicine when, 10 years ago, Family Medicine published 4 articles on the state of geriatrics training. Overall conclusions from these studies were that the Residency Review Committee's downgrading of geriatrics training requirements from "must" to "should" were met with the expected responses of deemphasizing geriatrics education. Barriers to geriatric education, not to mention house calls, include limited geriatric faculty and competing curricular demands.
机译:致编辑:作为一个相对较新的家庭医学住院医师毕业生,我亲身经历了如何实现通常要求的研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)两次上门服务的要求。我和我的大多数居民在第三年下半年打了我们的上门服务,培训内容包括被告知“上门服务袋”在哪里,并确保我们记录了这次访问。当然,这还不足以将内部电话加入到实践中,而是“打勾”以免引起ACGME的引用。我同意作者的观点,关于家庭医学住院医师的全国自建诊疗课程将是一个极好的资源。 10年前,《家庭医学》发表了4篇有关老年医学训练状态的文章时,似乎有加强家庭医学中老年医学训练的动力。这些研究的总体结论是,居留权审查委员会将老年医学培训要求从“必须”降级为“应该”得到了对老年医学教育不再重视的预期反应。老年教育的障碍,更不用说上门拜访了,包括有限的老年教师和竞争的课程需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号