...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM >Are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers especially useful for cardiovascular protection?
【24h】

Are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers especially useful for cardiovascular protection?

机译:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对心血管保护是否特别有用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: This article seeks to objectively review the clinical trial evidence to determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) have special cardiovascular protective effects. METHODS: An objective review of the clinical trial evidence. RESULTS: Clinical trials in hypertensive patients comparing ACEI and ARB with other drugs generally showed no difference in the primary cardiovascular outcome (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group, Captopril Prevention Project, Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension 2, Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B Randomized Trial, Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial, Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study Group, Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation). Where the primary, or major secondary, cardiovascular end-point favors one of the treatment arms, it was always the arm with the lower achieved blood pressure that saw the better clinical result as in Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study, Captopril Prevention Project, Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial, and Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation. Trials comparing ACEI or ARB against placebo in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events have not showed a consistent resu cardiovascular outcomes were reduced in Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation, European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease, and the Jikei Heart Study, but were not significantly reduced in Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study, Comparison of Arnlodipine vs Enalapril to Limit Occurrences of Thrombosis Trial, Prevention of Events with ACEIs Trial, Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE-Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease Trial, and Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes Trial. In the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial, combining ACEIs with ARBs in high-risk patients did not reduce cardiovascular or renal outcomes compared with ACEI monotherapy alone. This absence of a reduction in cardiovascular outcome from the ACEI and ARB combination arm is further evidence suggesting that these drugs do not have any special cardiovascular protective effect. This objective review thus shows that the rennin-angiotensin antagonists do not have special cardiovascular protective properties. CONCLUSION: The key to reducing cardiovascular outcome is to appropriately control blood pressure as well as to treat all other coronary risk factors.
机译:目的:本文旨在客观地回顾临床试验证据,以确定血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)是否具有特殊的心血管保护作用。方法:客观审查临床试验证据。结果:在高血压患者中进行的临床试验将ACEI和ARB与其他药物进行比较,结果表明,其主要心血管结局无差异(英国前瞻性糖尿病研究小组,卡托普利预防项目,瑞典老年高血压患者试验2,日本心血管疾病多中心调查) -B预防心脏病发作的随机试验,降压和降脂治疗,澳大利亚第二血压研究小组,缬沙坦抗高血压长期使用评估)。在主要或主要次要心血管终点偏向于其中一个治疗组的情况下,卡托普利预防项目的“降低血压的洛沙坦干预”研究始终是血压较低的组,其临床效果更好。 ,用于预防心脏病发作的降压和降脂治疗以及缬沙坦抗高血压长期使用评估。在心血管事件高风险患者中比较ACEI或ARB与安慰剂的试验未显示出一致的结果。心脏预后评估,减少培哚普利用于稳定冠状动脉疾病的欧洲事件的欧洲试验和吉凯心脏研究的心血管结局均降低,但培哚普利对复发性卒中的保护研究,阿洛地平与依那普利的比较限制血栓形成试验的发生率,ACEI试验的预防事件,替米沙坦的ACE耐受对象心血管疾病试验的随机评估研究以及有效避免二次卒中的预防方案。在单独进行的替米沙坦治疗中以及与雷米普利全球终点试验联合使用中,与仅使用ACEI单药治疗相比,在高危患者中将ACEIs与ARBs联合使用不会降低心血管或肾脏预后。这种由ACEI和ARB组合治疗产生的心血管结果没有减少的证据进一步表明这些药物没有任何特殊的心血管保护作用。因此,该客观综述表明,肾素-血管紧张素拮抗剂没有特殊的心血管保护作用。结论:降低心血管结局的关键是适当控制血压以及治疗所有其他冠心病危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号