首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents: Results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity in Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy with Prasugrel) study
【24h】

A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents: Results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity in Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy with Prasugrel) study

机译:普拉格雷与氯吡格雷在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并植入药物洗脱支架后对氯吡格雷具有高血小板反应性的患者的随机试验:TRIGGER-PCI(在接受氯吡格雷选择性支架置入术的患者中测试血小板反应性以指导替代疗法)与普拉格雷(Prasugrel)研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the efficacy, safety, and antiplatelet effect of prasugrel as compared with clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background: The extent to which prasugrel can correct HTPR and improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective PCI is unknown. Methods: Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with HTPR (208 P2Y 12 reaction units [PRU] by the VerifyNow test) after elective PCI with at least 1 drug-eluting stent (DES) were randomly assigned to either prasugrel 10 mg daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Platelet reactivity of the patients on the study drug was reassessed at 3 and 6 months. The study was stopped prematurely for futility because of a lower than expected incidence of the primary endpoint. Results: In 212 patients assigned to prasugrel, PRU decreased from 245 (225 to 273) (median [interquartile range]) at baseline to 80 (42 to 124) at 3 months, whereas in 211 patients assigned to clopidogrel, PRU decreased from 249 (225 to 277) to 241 (194 to 275) (p 0.001 vs. prasugrel). The primary efficacy endpoint of cardiac death or myocardial infarction at 6 months occurred in no patient on prasugrel versus 1 on clopidogrel. The primary safety endpoint of non-coronary artery bypass graft Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding at 6 months occurred in 3 patients (1.4%) on prasugrel versus 1 (0.5%) on clopidogrel. Conclusions: Switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel in patients with HTPR afforded effective platelet inhibition. However, given the low rate of adverse ischemic events after PCI with contemporary DES in stable CAD, the clinical utility of this strategy could not be demonstrated. (Testing platelet Reactivity In patients underGoing elective stent placement on clopidogrel to Guide alternative thErapy with pRasugrel [TRIGGER-PCI]; NCT00910299).
机译:目的:本研究旨在探讨普拉格雷与氯吡格雷相比在选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后具有高治疗血小板反应性(HTPR)的患者中的疗效,安全性和抗血小板作用。背景:普拉格雷在接受选择性PCI的患者中可在多大程度上纠正HTPR并改善临床结局尚不清楚。方法:择期PCI且至少有1个药物洗脱支架(DES)的HTPR(经VerifyNow测试> 208 P2Y 12反应单位[PRU])的稳定冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者随机分配至普拉格雷10 mg每天或氯吡格雷75毫克每天。在3个月和6个月时重新评估患者对研究药物的血小板反应性。由于主要终点事件的发生率低于预期,该研究因徒劳而过早终止。结果:在分配给普拉格雷的212例患者中,PRU从基线时的245(225至273)(中位[四分位数范围])降低至3个月时的80(42至124),而在分配给氯吡格雷的211患者中,PRU从249降低(225至277)至241(194至275)(相对于普拉格雷,p <0.001)。 6个月时心律失常或心肌梗死的主要疗效终点在普拉格雷组的患者中没有发生,而氯吡格雷组的患者是1个。非冠状动脉搭桥术溶栓的主要安全终点在心肌梗塞中,普拉格雷治疗的3例患者(1.4%)发生了6个月的大出血,而氯吡格雷治疗的1例患者发生了大出血(0.5%)。结论:HTPR患者从氯吡格雷改用普拉格雷可有效抑制血小板。但是,考虑到PCI与当代DES在稳定CAD中发生不良缺血事件的发生率较低,因此无法证明该策略的临床实用性。 (测试血小板反应性的患者在氯吡格雷上进行择期支架置入以指导pRasugrel [TRIGGER-PCI]; NCT00910299的替代疗法)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号