...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical drug investigation >Voriconazole Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis Real-World versus Health-Economic Model Results
【24h】

Voriconazole Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis Real-World versus Health-Economic Model Results

机译:伏立康唑治疗侵袭性曲霉病的现实世界与健康经济模型的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess, in a real-world setting, the predictive validity (in terms of clinical outcome and treatment cost) of the voriconazole arm of a health-economic model applied in the Belgian reimbursement submission for use of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Methods: A non-interventional study was designed to prospectively collect clinical response and direct costs data related to the treatment of invasive aspergillosis with voriconazole (oral, intravenous) in real-world practice. The outcomes of this study were compared with the inputs and outputs of the health-economic model. For the analysis, unit costs of 2002 from the public payer's perspective, as used in the model, were applied. Results: Data from 116 patients with invasive aspergillosis starting treatment with voriconazole were collected. At 12 weeks, there were similar rates of satisfactory clinical response for the observational study and the model, the latter based on the results of a clinical study (50% vs 53%, respectively). Overall mortality rates at 84 days were 42% in the observational study and 29% in the model. Average total healthcare cost associated with voriconazole treatment was lower in the observational study compared with the model for all patients. When the cost for all hospitalization days from the start until the end of the fungal infection was included in the analysis, the average total cost was 鈧? 674. When the cost for only those hospitalization days solely related to the fungal infection was included in the analysis, the average total cost was 鈧? 376. These costs are below the cost predicted by the model of euvopean dollow21 298. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that the results provided in the voriconazole arm of the health-economic model were valid estimates with regard to real-world outcomes but with a slightly better survival rate and higher costs than in real life.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是在真实环境中评估伏立康唑组在比利时报销申请中使用的健康经济模型中的伏立康唑组的预测有效性(就临床结果和治疗费用而言)。伏立康唑治疗侵袭性曲霉病。方法:一项非干预性研究旨在前瞻性地收集与伏立康唑(口服,静脉内)治疗侵袭性曲霉病有关的临床反应和直接费用数据。将本研究的结果与健康经济模型的输入和输出进行比较。为了进行分析,使用了模型中使用的2002年从公共付款方的角度来看的单位成本。结果:收集了116例伏立康唑开始治疗的侵袭性曲霉病患者的数据。在12周时,观察性研究和模型的满意临床反应率相似,后者基于临床研究的结果(分别为50%和53%)。在观察研究中,第84天的总死亡率为42%,在模型中为29%。与所有患者模型相比,在观察性研究中与伏立康唑治疗相关的平均总医疗费用较低。如果将从真菌感染开始到结束的所有住院天的费用都包括在分析中,则平均总费用为? 674.如果仅将仅与真菌感染有关的住院天的费用包括在分析中,则平均总费用为? 376.这些费用低于欧洲烟草模型的预测费用[21]。298.结论:该分析表明,卫生经济模型的伏立康唑组提供的结果是对实际结果的有效估计,但略有下降比现实生活中更好的生存率和更高的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号