...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of substance abuse treatment >Comparative analysis of state requirements for the training of substance abuse and mental health counselors.
【24h】

Comparative analysis of state requirements for the training of substance abuse and mental health counselors.

机译:对国家对滥用药物和心理健康咨询师的培训要求的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Data on minimum state requirements for drug and alcohol counselors and mental health counselors in all 50 states and Washington, DC, suggest that training as a mental health counselor is primarily structured through formal education, whereas training as a substance abuse counselor resembles an apprentice model. Fewer states offer or require certification or licensure of substance abuse counselors, compared to mental health counselors. States that do offer such credentials for substance abuse counselors generally require more hours of supervised work experience and continuing education, but fewer hours of formal course work and practicum courses, and a lower level of formal education. Although these different models for training are valid, they each have different implications for clinical practice, dissemination of research findings to practice, and management within the service delivery model.
机译:在所有50个州和华盛顿特区,有关毒品和酒精咨询师和心理健康咨询师的最低州要求数据表明,作为心理健康咨询师的培训主要是通过正规教育来进行的,而作为药物滥用咨询师的培训则类似于学徒模式。与精神卫生顾问相比,很少有州提供或要求对滥用药物顾问进行认证或许可。确实为滥用药物咨询员提供此类证书的国家通常需要更多时间的监督工作经验和继续教育,但需要较少时间的正规课程工作和实习课程,以及较低水平的正规教育。尽管这些不同的培训模型是有效的,但它们各自对临床实践,将研究发现传播到实践以及服务提供模型中的管理具有不同的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号