首页> 外文期刊>Journal of robotic surgery >Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications
【24h】

Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications

机译:阴道和机器人辅助子宫切除术对良性适应症的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy in patients with benign gynecologic conditions, using a retrospective chart review of 240 consecutive benign hysterectomies from May 2008 to April of 2010 performed by a single surgical team at the Eisenhower Medical Center. The analysis included an equal number of cases in each group: 120 robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomies and 120 total vaginal hysterectomies. Consecutive cases met the inclusion criteria of benign disease. There were no statistically significant differences related to age, body mass index, history of prior abdominal surgery, or uterine weight. Operative times in the robotic group were significantly longer by an average of 59 min (p < 0.001). Patients with robotic-assisted hysterectomy had clinically equivalent estimated blood loss (55.5 ml vs. 84.7 ml, p < 0.001) and the intraoperative complication rates were 1.7% vaginal versus 0% robotic (p - 0.156). There was one conversion in the vaginal group due to pelvic adhesions and no conversions in the robotic group. Length of hospital stay was 1 day for both groups. The perioperative complication rates were equivalent between groups (6.7 vs. 11.7%, p = 0.180), but there were more major complications in the vaginal group (0 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.044). We conclude that, in a comparable group of patients, robotic-assisted hysterectomy takes longer to complete but results in fewer major complications.
机译:我们旨在比较2008年5月至2010年4月由艾森豪威尔医学中心的一个手术团队对240例连续的良性子宫切除术进行回顾性图表回顾,以比较机器人辅助子宫切除术和阴道良性妇科患者的围手术期结局。该分析在每组中包括相等数量的病例:120例机器人辅助的全腹腔镜子宫切除术和120例总阴道子宫切除术。连续病例符合良性疾病的纳入标准。与年龄,体重指数,既往腹部手术史或子宫重量无统计学差异。机器人组的手术时间平均延长了59分钟(p <0.001)。机器人辅助子宫切除术患者的临床失血量估计相当(55.5 ml vs. 84.7 ml,p <0.001),术中并发症发生率为阴道阴道1.7%vs机械手0%(p-0.156)。由于骨盆粘连,阴道组只有一次转换,机器人组没有转换。两组的住院时间均为1天。组间围手术期并发症发生率相同(6.7比11.7%,p = 0.180),但阴道组有更多的主要并发症(0比3.3%,p = 0.044)。我们得出的结论是,在一组可比较的患者中,机器人辅助子宫切除术需要更长的时间才能完成,但导致的主要并发症更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号