首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sports sciences. >Discriminating talent-identified junior Australian football players using a video decision-making task
【24h】

Discriminating talent-identified junior Australian football players using a video decision-making task

机译:使用视频决策任务来区分有才能的澳大利亚初级足球运动员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examined if a video decision-making task could discriminate talent-identified junior Australian football players from their non-talent-identified counterparts. Participants were recruited from the 2013 under 18 (U18) West Australian Football League competition and classified into two groups: talent-identified (State U18 Academy representatives; n=25; 17.8 +/- 0.5 years) and non-talent-identified (non-State U18 Academy selection; n=25; 17.3 +/- 0.6 years). Participants completed a video decision-making task consisting of 26 clips sourced from the Australian Football League game-day footage, recording responses on a sheet provided. A score of 1 was given for correct and 0 for incorrect responses, with the participants total score used as the criterion value. One-way analysis of variance tested the main effect of status on the task criterion, whilst a bootstrapped receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve assessed the discriminant ability of the task. An area under the curve (AUC) of 1 (100%) represented perfect discrimination. Between-group differences were evident (P<0.05) and the ROC curve was maximised with a score of 15.5/26 (60%) (AUC=89.0%), correctly classifying 92% and 76% of the talent-identified and non-talent-identified participants, respectively. Future research should investigate the mechanisms leading to the superior decision-making observed in the talent-identified group.
机译:这项研究检查了视频决策任务是否可以将以天赋识别的澳大利亚初级足球运动员与无才能的同行区别开来。参与者是从2013年在18岁以下(U18)西澳大利亚足球联赛中招募的参与者,分为两类:才华横溢(国家U18学院代表; n = 25; 17.8 +/- 0.5岁)和非才华横溢(非-U18州立大学选拔赛; n = 25; 17.3 +/- 0.6年。参与者完成了一个视频决策任务,该视频决策任务由来自澳大利亚足球联赛比赛日录像的26个剪辑组成,并在提供的表格上记录了回复。正确答案的得分为1,错误回答的得分为0,参与者的总得分用作标准值。单向方差分析测试了状态对任务标准的主要影响,而自举接收器操作特性(ROC)曲线评估了任务的判别能力。曲线下的面积(AUC)为1(100%)表示完全分辨。组间差异明显(P <0.05),ROC曲线最大化,得分为15.5 / 26(60%)(AUC = 89.0%),正确分类了92%和76%的人才识别型和非人才识别型有才能的参与者。未来的研究应该调查在人才识别小组中观察到的导致上级决策的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号