...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sports sciences. >The possession game? A comparative analysis of ball retention and team success in European and international football, 2007-2010
【24h】

The possession game? A comparative analysis of ball retention and team success in European and international football, 2007-2010

机译:拥有游戏? 2007-2010年欧洲和国际足球持球量和球队成功率的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Possession is thought of as central to success in modern football, but questions remain about its impact on positive team outcomes (Bate, 1988; Hughes & Franks, 2005; Pollard & Reep, 1997; Stanhope, 2001). Recent studies (e.g. Bloomfield, Polman, & O'Donoghue, 2005; Carling, Williams, & Reilly, 2005; James, Mellallieu, & Holley, 2002; Jones, James, & Mellalieu, 2004; Lago, 2009; Lago & Martin, 2007; Lago-Pe?as & Dellal, 2010; Lago-Pe?as, Lago-Ballesteros, Dellal, & G??mez, 2010; Taylor, Mellalieu, & James, 2005; Tucker, Mellalieu, James, & Taylor, 2005) that have examined these questions have often been constrained by an exclusive focus on English or Spanish domestic play. Using data from five European leagues, UEFA and FIFA tournaments, the study found that while possession time and passing predicted aggregated team success in domestic league play, both variables were poor predictors at the individual match level once team quality and home advantage were accounted for. In league play, the effect of greater possession was consistently negative; in the Champions League, it had virtually no impact. In national team tournaments, possession failed to reach significance when offensive factors were accounted for. Much of the success behind the 'possession game' was thus a function of elite teams confined in geographic and competitive space. That ball hegemony was not consistently tied to success suggests that a nuanced approach to possession is needed to account for variant strategic environments (e.g. James et al., 2002) and compels match analysts to re-examine the metric's overall value. ? 2013
机译:管治被认为是现代足球成功的关键,但是对于管教对球队积极成果的影响仍然存在疑问(贝特,1988;休斯和弗兰克斯,2005;波拉德和雷普,1997;斯坦霍普,2001)。最近的研究(例如Bloomfield,Polman和O'Donoghue,2005年; Carling,Williams和Reilly,2005年; James,Mellallieu和Holley,2002年; Jones,James和Mellalieu,2004年; Lago,2009年; Lago和Martin, 2007年; Lago-Pe?as和Dellal,2010年; Lago-Pe?as,Lago-Ballesteros,Dellal和G ?? mez,2010年; Taylor,Mellalieu和James,2005年; Tucker,Mellalieu,James和Taylor, (2005年),对这些问题进行了研究,通常只限于专注于英语或西班牙语家庭游戏。使用来自五个欧洲联赛,UEFA和FIFA锦标赛的数据,研究发现,尽管拥有时间和传球预测的在国内联赛中的球队成功总数,但一旦考虑到球队的质量和主场优势,这两个变量在个人比赛水平上都是较差的预测指标。在联赛中,拥有更大的球权一直是负面的;在冠军联赛中,这几乎没有影响。在国家队比赛中,考虑到进攻因素后,控球权的重要性不高。因此,“占有游戏”背后的许多成功都是精英团队在地理和竞争空间中的作用。霸权主义并不总是与成功联系在一起,这表明需要一种细微的所有权控制方法来解决变化的战略环境(例如James等人,2002年),并迫使比赛分析师重新检查该指标的整体价值。 ? 2013年

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号