首页> 外文期刊>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: The official journal of National Stroke Association >Comparison of Combined Venous and Arterial Thrombolysis with Primary Arterial Therapy Using Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke
【24h】

Comparison of Combined Venous and Arterial Thrombolysis with Primary Arterial Therapy Using Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke

机译:重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂联合静脉和动脉溶栓与主要动脉治疗在急性缺血性卒中中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of combined intravenous (IV) and intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis with primary IA therapy using tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset. Methods: We performed quasirandomization of a single institution's prospectivelycollected stroke database, comparing IV/IA (0.6 mg/kg IV <= 60 mg, followed by 0.3 mg/kg IA <= 30 mg) versus primary IA. Outcome measures include 90-day modified Rankin scale score, mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and recanalization rates. Statistical analysis was performed using bivariate and propensity score methods. Results: Of 1057 patients, 41 patients were treated with IV/IA,and 55 with IA. There was significant difference in time to treatment (mean of 151 minutes for the combined group and 261 minutes for the IA, P < .0001) and arterial tissue plasminogen activator dose (17.5 mg for IV/IA upsilon 22.8 mg for IA only, P = .05). Propensity score matching yielded 25 patients in each group. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rate was 12% in each group. Mortality was 20% in the IV/IA group versus 16% in the IA group (relative risk 1.3 [0.4-4.1], P = .7). More patients in IV/IA group had modified Rankin scale score less than or equal to 2 (odds ratio 1.6 [0.5-5.8], P = .3). Recanalization was 64% with IV/IA versus 48% with IA (odds ratio 1.9 [0.5-7.0], P = .3). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that both combined IV/IA and primary IA recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy is feasible and safe in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Combined IV/IA therapy may be associated with an improvement in clinical outcome without a significant increase in the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality compared with IA therapy.
机译:目的:我们试图比较使用组织纤溶酶原激活剂治疗症状发作后6小时内出现的急性缺血性卒中的静脉(IV)和动脉内(IA)联合溶栓与原发性IA治疗的安全性和有效性。方法:我们对单个机构的前瞻性收集的卒中数据库进行了拟随机化,将IV / IA(0.6 mg / kg IV <= 60 mg,然后0.3 mg / kg IA <= 30 mg)与原发性IA进行了比较。结果指标包括90天改良的Rankin量表评分,死亡率,有症状的脑出血和再通率。使用双变量和倾向评分方法进行统计分析。结果:在1057例患者中,有41例接受了IV / IA治疗,而55例接受了IA。治疗时间(合并组平均151分钟,IA平均261分钟,P <.0001)和动脉组织纤溶酶原激活剂剂量(IV / IA上丘17.5 mg,IA 22.8 mg,P,P = .05)。倾向得分匹配在每组中产生25名患者。每组症状性脑出血率为12%。 IV / IA组的死亡率为20%,IA组的死亡率为16%(相对危险度1.3 [0.4-4.1],P = 0.7)。 IV / IA组中有更多患者的改良Rankin量表评分小于或等于2(优势比1.6 [0.5-5.8],P = .3)。 IV / IA的再通率为64%,IA的为48%(赔率1.9 [0.5-7.0],P = .3)。结论:这项研究表明,IV / IA和原发性IA重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂联合治疗对于急性缺血性中风是可行且安全的。与IA治疗相比,IV / IA联合治疗可改善临床结局,而无症状性脑出血和死亡的风险显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号