首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Cardiovascular Responses to Isometric Hand grip vs. Relaxed Hand Grip in Sustained Cycling Efforts.
【24h】

Cardiovascular Responses to Isometric Hand grip vs. Relaxed Hand Grip in Sustained Cycling Efforts.

机译:在持续骑行中,等距手握力与放松手握力的心血管反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ABSTRACT: Canivel, RG, Wyatt, FB, and Baker, JS. Cardiovascular responses to isometric hand grip vs. relaxed hand grip in sustained cycling efforts. J Strength Cond Res 26(11): 3101-3105, 2012-Peripheral isometric contractions may lead to enhanced performance. Previous research using hand grip protocols indicates increased stabilization and peak power outputs. Research is lacking with the grip vs. no-grip protocol during sustained efforts. The purpose of this study is to determine cardiovascular reactions (i.e., heart rate [HR], blood pressure [BP], and rate pressure product [RPP]) during sustained cycling via an isometric and relaxed hand grip. Nine (n = 9) recreational cyclists participated in this study. After signing a medical and physical readiness questionnaire, the subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 different protocols. Preexercising values of the HR (beats per minute), BP (miilimeters of mercury), height (centimeters), weight (kilograms), and age (years) were assessed before testing. A Monark bicycle ergometer was used for testing. Grip was substantiated through the use of a hand grip dynamometer at 20 kg of tension. Protocol 1 used an isometric "Hand Grip" scenario at 150 W for 20 minutes. Protocol 2 used a "Relaxed Hand Grip" at the same power and time. During the 20-minute exercise test, HR (POLAR), BP (stethoscope and sphygmomanometer), and calculated RPP (HR × systolic BP [SPB]/100) were recorded every minute. Statistical measures included mean and SDs between protocols, and dependent samples t-tests were used to examine differences between grip and no-grip protocols. At an alpha of ≤0.05, SBP did show a significant increase when using no grip, 161.4 (5.1) mm Hg vs. grip, 154.1 (6.6) mm Hg. However, rate pressure product and heart rate showed no significant differences between protocols. Our data suggested that the use of an isometric hand grip is transient and diminishes over time.
机译:摘要:Canivel,RG,Wyatt,FB和Baker,JS。在持续的骑行努力中,心血管对等距手握力与放松手握力的反应。 J Strength Cond Res 26(11):3101-3105,2012-外围等距收缩可能会导致性能提高。以前使用手握协议的研究表明增加了稳定性和峰值功率输出。在持续的努力中,缺乏抓地力与无抓地力协议的研究缺乏。这项研究的目的是通过等距和放松的手握力来确定持续循环过程中的心血管反应(即心率[HR],血压[BP]和心率压积[RPP])。九(n = 9)个休闲自行车手参加了这项研究。签署医疗和身体状况调查问卷后,将受试者随机分配到2种不同方案中的1种。在测试之前,先评估HR(每分钟的心跳数),BP(汞的毫米数),身高(厘米),体重(千克)和年龄(年)的锻炼前值。使用Monark自行车测功机进行测试。通过使用手持式测功机在20 kg的张力下证实了抓地力。协议1在150 W的情况下使用等距的“握力”场景20分钟。协议2在相同的功率和时间使用了“松弛的手握力”。在20分钟的运动测试中,每分钟记录一次HR(POLAR),BP(听诊器和血压计)和计算出的RPP(HR×收缩压[SPB] / 100)。统计量度包括方案之间的均值和标准差,相关样本t检验用于检查抓地力和无把手方案之间的差异。在不超过0.05的alpha值下,不使用握持力时,SBP确实显示出显着增加,为161.4(5.1)mm Hg,而握持力为154.1(6.6)mm Hg。但是,速率压力乘积和心率在方案之间没有显着差异。我们的数据表明,等距手柄的使用是短暂的,并且会随着时间的推移而减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号