...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >The acute effect of whole-body low-frequency vibration on countermovement vertical jump performance in college-aged men.
【24h】

The acute effect of whole-body low-frequency vibration on countermovement vertical jump performance in college-aged men.

机译:全身低频振动对大学生男性反运动垂直跳跃性能的急性影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of whole-body vibration on jump performance. A total of 21 college-aged men, 18-30 years, recreationally resistance trained, were exposed to a total of 4 different acute whole-body low-frequency vibration (WBLFV) protocols (conditions 1-4), performing 2 protocols per testing session in random order. Exposures were all performed using high-amplitude (peak-peak 4-6 mm) and either 30 or 50 Hz for 30 continuous seconds, or 3 exposures of 10 seconds with 1 minute between exposures. Three countermovement vertical jumps (CMVJs) were performed before vibration (testing phase 1 or Tp1 and J1 the highest of 3 attempts) and at 3 separate time points postvibration (Tp2-4). Jump height (cm), peak power (Pmax), peak power per kilogram of body mass (Pmax kg), mean power (Pav), and mean velocity (Vav) were recorded. Repeated measures analysis of variance and analysis of covariance revealed no significant condition (C) or jump (J) differences for CMVJ height (cm) (p > 0.05). Analysis of percent change (Delta%) for CMVJ height (cm) revealed a significant Condition x Jump interaction, C4, J3 > C1, J3 (p = 0.009, mean diff 4.12%). Analysis of Pmax and Pmax kg revealed no significant Condition, Jump, or Condition x Jump interaction for the raw data or percent change (p > 0.05). Analysis of Pav (W) revealed significant differences for Condition (p = 0.031) but not for Jump (p = 0.226). There was a strong trend toward significance for Condition x Jump interaction (p = 0.059). C4 > C3 (p = 0.043, mean diff 23.78 W) and C1 (p = 0.038, mean diff 32.03 W). Analysis of Vav (m.s) revealed no significant main effects for Condition or Jump (p > 0.05) but found a significant Condition x Jump interaction (p = 0.007). C4, J6 > C2, J6 (p = 0.014, mean diff 0.05 m.s), and C3, J6 (p = 0.020, 0.05 m.s). WBLFV applied intermittently using 50 Hz appears to be more effective than other protocols using 30 and 50 Hz in facilitating select measures of CMVJ performance over a 17-minute time period post-WBLFV exposure. Practical manipulation of such a WBLFV "dose" may be beneficial to strength and conditioning practitioners wanting to acutely facilitate CMVJ and slow stretch shortening cycle performance while minimizing exposure time.
机译:这项研究的目的是检查全身振动对跳跃性能的急性影响。总共21位18-30岁,接受过娱乐性抵抗训练的大学年龄男性接受了总共4种不同的急性全身低频振动(WBLFV)协议(条件1-4)的测试,每个测试执行2个协议会话以随机顺序。所有曝光均使用高振幅(峰值-峰值4-6 mm)和30或50 Hz连续30秒,或3次10秒的曝光,两次曝光之间间隔1分钟。在振动之前(测试阶段1或Tp1和J1为3次尝试中的最高水平)和振动后的3个单独时间点(Tp2-4)进行了三个反向运动垂直跳动(CMVJs)。记录跳跃高度(cm),峰值功率(Pmax),每千克体重的峰值功率(Pmax kg),平均功率(Pav)和平均速度(Vav)。重复测量方差分析和协方差分析显示,CMVJ高度(cm)没有明显的条件(C)或跳跃(J)差异(p> 0.05)。 CMVJ高度(cm)的变化百分比(Delta%)分析显示出显着的条件x跳跃相互作用,C4,J3> C1,J3(p = 0.009,平均差异4.12%)。 Pmax和Pmax kg的分析显示,对于原始数据或百分比变化,无显着的条件,跳跃或条件x跳跃相互作用(p> 0.05)。 Pav(W)的分析显示条件(p = 0.031)有显着差异,而跳跃(p = 0.226)没有显着差异。条件x跳跃相互作用有显着的显着趋势(p = 0.059)。 C4> C3(p = 0.043,平均差异23.78 W)和C1(p = 0.038,平均差异32.03 W)。对Vav(m.s)的分析显示,条件或跳跃没有显着的主要影响(p> 0.05),但条件x跳跃的相互作用显着(p = 0.007)。 C4,J6> C2,J6(p = 0.014,平均差异0.05毫秒),以及C3,J6(p = 0.020,0.05毫秒)。 WBLFV间歇使用50 Hz施加的WBLFV似乎比其他使用30 Hz和50 Hz的协议更有效,以便于在WBLFV暴露后的17分钟时间内选择CMVJ性能的选择指标。此类WBLFV“剂量”的实际操作可能对希望快速促进CMVJ并减慢拉伸缩短周期性能同时最小化暴露时间的力量和调理从业者有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号