首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sound and Vibration >Transportation noise annoyance--a simulated-environment study for road, railway and aircraft noises, part 1: overall annoyance
【24h】

Transportation noise annoyance--a simulated-environment study for road, railway and aircraft noises, part 1: overall annoyance

机译:运输噪声烦恼-道路,铁路和飞机噪声的模拟环境研究,第1部分:总体烦扰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents a simulated-environment study to determine the effects of noise level and source type on annoyance responses to different transportation noises. Noise sources used in the study were; road, railway and aircraft traffic whose noise levels varied between 30-55 dB(A) in L_(eq) (indoor). Pass-by number for railway and aircraft traffic had values of 8, 12 and 16 per 30 min, while road traffic was continuous during this period. 64 subjects attending three different sessions of 30 min each, filled in a special questionnaire during the experiments. At each session, the subjects performed two different activities (reading and listening) and thus in addition to the overall annoyance, the activity disturbance was investigated. The total of 192 answers were analyzed as individual values, group average scores and highly annoyed subjects (HA%). The overall annoyance in both group average scores (giving the best correlation with noise level) and individual scores, are presented in this first of the two companion papers. The noise and annoyance relationships determined for each source revealed very strong dependence on noise levels and the regression lines displayed a steeper increase in comparison with the previous results. The significance of the source-type effect on annoyance was found at the levels of 0.03 and 0.02 for the overall annoyance question (P < 0.05). However since this effect was significant only for half of the different questions asked, it can be said that the source type is not a highly deterministic factor while the respondents are concentrating on daily work at home. Railway noise appeared to be the most prominent noise source in the overall annoyance, especially at moderate and low noise levels. The results supported the view that L_(eq) = 45 dB(A) is an indoor noise limit indicating a crossover between the source-specific annoyance lines. The activity disturbance will be elaborated in Part 2.
机译:本文提出了一个模拟环境研究,以确定噪声水平和声源类型对不同运输噪声的烦扰响应的影响。研究中使用的噪声源是:在L_(eq)(室内)内噪声水平在30-55 dB(A)之间变化的公路,铁路和飞机交通。铁路和飞机交通的通过人数数值为每30分钟8、12和16,而在此期间道路交通持续不断。 64位受试者参加了三个不同的会议,每节30分钟,并在实验过程中填写了特别问卷。在每节课中,受试者进行了两种不同的活动(阅读和听力),因此,除了整体烦恼之外,还对活动干扰进行了调查。总共192个答案被分析为个人价值,小组平均分数和高度烦恼的受试者(HA%)。两组伴奏的第一篇介绍了小组平均分数(与噪音水平的最佳相关性)和个人分数的整体烦恼。为每个源确定的噪声和烦恼关系显示了对噪声水平的非常强的依赖性,并且回归线与以前的结果相比显示出更陡峭的增加。对于整个烦恼问题,源类型对烦恼的影响的显着性水平为0.03和0.02(P <0.05)。但是,由于这种影响仅对所问问题的一半有效,因此可以说,在受访者专注于在家的日常工作时,来源类型不是高度确定性的因素。在整个烦扰中,铁路噪声似乎是最突出的噪声源,尤其是在中低噪声水平下。结果支持这样的观点,即L_(eq)= 45 dB(A)是室内噪声极限,指示特定于源的烦扰线之间有交叉。活动干扰将在第2部分中详细说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号