首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sound and Vibration >An experimental comparison of the focused beamformer and the inverse method for the characterisation of acoustic sources in ideal and non-ideal acoustic environments
【24h】

An experimental comparison of the focused beamformer and the inverse method for the characterisation of acoustic sources in ideal and non-ideal acoustic environments

机译:在理想和非理想声学环境中聚焦波束形成器和逆方法表征声源的实验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The current availability and affordability of multi-microphone array systems has awakened a strong interest in sound source location and characterisation in many fields of experimental acoustics and noise control. Although the theory behind the design of such arrays has been known for some time, the algorithms used to process the microphone signals are the subject of on-going research and development. The beamformer algorithm is well-known and relatively simple to implement. It is useful for 'scanning' an area to find the position of sound sources but has limited ability to characterise fully the spatial distribution of the strength of an acoustic source. The inverse method, on the other hand, requires prior information regarding the position of sources or an appropriate discretisation of the source strength distribution. The method is more difficult to implement but can yield more useful source characterisation data. This paper presents a comparison between the two methods based on experimental data. The results show that, in the presence of more than one source, the beamformer cannot yield reliable estimates of the source strength of individual sources since the output from the beamformer is shown to be dependent upon the degree of correlation between multiple sources as well as the source strengths themselves. The inverse method, on the other hand, is shown to yield reliable estimates of source strength when more than one source is present, regardless of the correlation between the sources, although the results presented here are restricted to the case of a relatively small number of sources. It is clearly demonstrated, both theoretically and through carefully controlled experiments, that either method can be used effectively under reverberant conditions through the use of measured Green functions in place of the simple geometrically-derived free-space values of the Green function. This greatly improves the possibility for the successful use of these methods in many important industrial applications.
机译:多麦克风阵列系统的当前可用性和可承受性已引起人们对实验声学和噪声控制的许多领域中声源定位和表征的强烈兴趣。尽管这种阵列设计背后的理论已为人所知,但用于处理麦克风信号的算法仍是正在进行的研究和开发的主题。波束形成器算法是众所周知的,并且实现起来相对简单。这对于“扫描”区域以查找声源的位置很有用,但无法完全表征声源强度的空间分布。另一方面,逆方法需要有关源位置或源强度分布的适当离散的先验信息。该方法更难以实施,但可以产生更多有用的源表征数据。本文根据实验数据对两种方法进行了比较。结果表明,在存在多个光源的情况下,由于波束形成器的输出取决于多个光源之间以及光源之间的相关程度,因此波束形成器无法对单个光源的光源强度进行可靠的估计。源自己的优势。另一方面,当存在多个源时,无论源之间的相关性如何,逆方法都显示出可靠的源强度估计值,尽管此处显示的结果仅限于相对较少数量的情况。资料来源。从理论上和通过精心控制的实验都清楚地表明,通过使用测得的格林函数代替格林函数的简单几何派生自由空间值,可以在混响条件下有效地使用这两种方法。这大大提高了在许多重要的工业应用中成功使用这些方法的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号