...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical colorectal cancer >Analysis of Response-Related and Time-to-event Endpoints in Randomized Trials of Gemcitabine-Based Treatment Versus Gemcitabine Alone as First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
【24h】

Analysis of Response-Related and Time-to-event Endpoints in Randomized Trials of Gemcitabine-Based Treatment Versus Gemcitabine Alone as First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

机译:基于吉西他滨的治疗与单独吉西他滨作为一线治疗晚期胰腺癌的随机试验的反应相关终点和事件发生时间终点的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The endpoints of trials of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer were examined in 37 randomized trials. Progression-free survival was strongly related to overall survival in chemotherapy and bio-chemotherapy trials, although this correlation could have been influenced by the interval of radiologic evaluation. Among the response-related endpoints, the disease control rate seems the most promising. Background: Gemcitabine-based combinations in advanced pancreatic cancer have been reported to have superior activity compared with gemcitabine alone. The results of the commonly used endpoints of clinical trials after chemotherapy or targeted therapy have been poorly reported. Methods and Materials: We performed a search of randomized trials of systemic treatment that included gemcitabine plus chemotherapy or targeted therapy versus gemcitabine alone. For selected trials, the differences between the treatment arms for every endpoint were calculated, and a correlation analysis between these differences and the differences in overall survival was performed for every intermediate endpoint. Whenever a correlation coefficient was significant, regression analysis was performed. Finally, an analysis was performed to evaluate the factors that could mediate and moderate the effect of progression-free survival on overall survival. Results: In addition to overall survival, progression-free survival, the overall response rate, and the disease control rate were the most frequently reported endpoints. Of the possible surrogate endpoints of overall survival, progression-free survival appears to be a reliable endpoint to assess chemotherapy (R-2 = 0.646) and chemotherapy plus targeted therapy (R-2 =.530) regimens and the disease control rate to assess chemotherapy (R-2 = 0.569). Of the factors that could limit the effect of progression-free survival on overall survival, the interval of radiologic evaluation could play a role. Conclusion: In the selected trials, progression-free survival and the disease control rate were the most reliable surrogate endpoints of overall survival. Similar to the time-to-event endpoints, a standardization of response-related endpoints is strongly recommended.
机译:在37项随机试验中检查了基于吉西他滨的转移性胰腺癌化疗试验的终点。无进展生存率在化学疗法和生物化学疗法试验中与总体生存力密切相关,尽管这种相关性可能受到放射学评估间隔的影响。在与反应有关的终点中,疾病控制率似乎是最有希望的。背景:据报道,与单独使用吉西他滨相比,基于吉西他滨的联合治疗晚期胰腺癌具有更高的活性。化疗或靶向治疗后临床试验常用终点的结果报道很少。方法和材料:我们对包括吉西他滨联合化疗或靶向治疗与吉西他滨单独治疗在内的全身治疗进行了随机试验。对于选定的试验,计算每个终点的治疗组之间的差异,并对每个中间终点进行这些差异与总生存期差异之间的相关性分析。只要相关系数显着,就进行回归分析。最后,进行了一项分析,以评估可介导和缓解无进展生存期对总体生存期影响的因素。结果:除了总体生存率外,无进展生存期,总体缓解率和疾病控制率也是最常报告的终点。在总体生存的可能替代终点中,无进展生存似乎是评估化疗(R-2 = 0.646)和化疗加靶向治疗(R-2 = .530)方案和疾病控制率的可靠终点化疗(R-2 = 0.569)。在可能限制无进展生存期对总体生存期影响的因素中,放射学评估的间隔可能起作用。结论:在所选试验中,无进展生存期和疾病控制率是总体生存期最可靠的替代终点。与事件发生时间端点类似,强烈建议对与响应相关的端点进行标准化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号