首页> 外文期刊>Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. >Complications and Unfavorable Clinical Outcomes in Obese and Overweight Patients Treated for Adult Lumbar or Thoracolumbar Scoliosis With Combined Anterior/Posterior Surgery
【24h】

Complications and Unfavorable Clinical Outcomes in Obese and Overweight Patients Treated for Adult Lumbar or Thoracolumbar Scoliosis With Combined Anterior/Posterior Surgery

机译:成人腰椎或胸腰段脊柱侧弯联合前/后手术治疗的肥胖和超重患者的并发症和不良临床结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Context:Combined anterior/posterior (A/P) spinal fusion with instrumentation has been used for many years in the treatment of adult thoracolumbar and lumbar (TL/L) scoliosis. However, the risk factors for complications and poor clinical outcomes with this procedure are not well known.Purpose:To assess the risk factors for poor clinical outcomes in a series of adult lumbar or scoliosis patients undergoing combined A/P-instrumented spinal fusion.Study Design:This study was a retrospective case series of surgically treated adult lumbar or thoracolumbar scoliosis patients.Patient Sample:From 1998 to 2006, 57 patients with diagnoses of adult idiopathic scoliosis or degenerative TL/L scoliosis underwent combined A/P spinal instrumentation and fusion at 1 institution, performed by 1 senior author.Outcome Measurements:The preoperative and postoperative outcome measurements included self-report measurements, physiological measurements, and functional measurements.Materials and Methods:A retrospective review of this patient group was performed to evaluate patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, pain, curve progression, and complications. Radiographic measurements included coronal balance, sagittal vertical axis, Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and during follow-up. In terms of risk factors, bone mineral density, body mass index, age, kyphosis, and fusion to the sacrum were reviewed. Postoperative Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire outcome scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and anterior surgical site pain (ASSP) were also evaluated. Means were compared with the Student t test and the (2) test. Logistic regression analyses were used to predict the probabilities and the odds ratios (ORs) of the risk factors for poor clinical outcomes. A P-value of <0.05 with a confidence interval of 95% was considered significant.Results:Fifty patients had adult idiopathic scoliosis, and 7 patients had degenerative scoliosis. The average age at surgery was 53.8 years (34-74 y), and the average follow-up was 4.8 years (2-11 y). Coronal correction for thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbosacral curves improved significantly. The degree of sagittal curve and coronal and sagittal balance were not significantly changed after surgery or at the final follow-up. ODI, the pain intensity domain of the ODI, and ASSP were significantly worse in obese and overweight patients, whereas OR time, estimated blood loss, and number of fused vertebrae were not different in the entire group (P=0.03 for ODI, P=0.002 for pain domain of ODI, and P=0.003 for ASSP). Logistic regression analyses for the risk factors of poor clinical outcomes indicated obesity and overweight as risk factors for poor clinical outcomes (OR=6.25 for ODI and 5.88 for ODI pain intensity score). A significantly higher rate of major complications occurred in this group compared to the entire group (30.4%, P=0.04). Low bone mineral density, old age, kyphosis, and fusion to the sacrum were not risk factors for poor clinical outcomes.Conclusions:Despite the good function scores and acceptable pain levels in most patients, the ODI scores of obese and overweight patients were worse compared to the rest of the patients in this study. Significantly worse scores on the pain intensity domain of the ODI and ASSP differences were likely caused by extensive dissection of the abdominal wall and psoas muscles and the technical difficulty of achieving an anterior approach to the thoracolumbar spine.
机译:背景技术:前/后(A / P)脊柱融合术与器械融合治疗成人胸腰椎和腰椎(TL / L)脊柱侧弯已有多年历史。目的:评估一系列成人腰椎或脊柱侧弯患者接受A / P联合脊柱融合治疗的临床结局不良的危险因素。设计:本研究是一组回顾性手术治疗的成人腰椎或胸腰段脊柱侧弯患者的病例。患者样本:1998年至2006年,对57例诊断为成人特发性脊柱侧凸或退行性TL / L脊柱侧弯的患者进行了A / P脊柱侧弯融合术在1家机构中,由1位资深作者进行。结果测量:术前和术后结果测量包括自我报告测量,生理学测量和功能测量。材料和方法:对该患者组进行回顾性评估,以评估患者的满意度,功能结果,疼痛,曲线进展和并发症。影像学检查包括术前,术后立即以及随访期间的冠状动脉平衡,矢状纵轴,Cobb角,胸椎后凸畸形,腰椎前凸和骨盆发生率。在危险因素方面,对骨矿物质密度,体重指数,年龄,驼背和融合到fusion骨进行了评估。术后脊柱侧弯研究学会患者问卷调查结果评分,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和前手术部位疼痛(ASSP)也进行了评估。将平均值与学生t检验和(2)检验进行比较。 Logistic回归分析用于预测不良临床结果的危险因素的概率和比值比(OR)。 P值<0.05,置信区间为95%被认为具有显着性。结果:成人特发性脊柱侧弯50例,变性性脊柱侧弯7例。手术的平均年龄为53.8岁(34-74岁),平均随访时间为4.8年(2-11岁)。胸,胸腰椎和腰s曲线的冠状矫正显着改善。手术后或最后一次随访时,矢状曲线的程度以及冠状和矢状平衡度均无明显变化。肥胖和超重患者的ODI,ODI的疼痛强度域和ASSP明显较差,而整个组的OR时间,估计的失血量和融合椎骨的数量在整个组中没有差异(ODI为P = 0.03,P = ODI的痛苦域为0.002,ASSP的为P = 0.003)。对临床效果差的危险因素进行逻辑回归分析表明,肥胖和超重是临床效果差的危险因素(ODI的OR = 6.25,ODI疼痛强度评分的5.88)。与整个组相比,该组的主要并发症发生率明显更高(30.4%,P = 0.04)。低骨密度,高龄,后凸畸形和were骨融合不是导致临床预后不良的危险因素。结论:尽管大多数患者的功能评分良好且疼痛程度可接受,肥胖和超重患者的ODI评分较差这项研究的其余患者。在ODI和ASSP差异的疼痛强度范围上评分明显较差,可能是由于腹壁和腰肌的广泛解剖以及实现胸腰椎前路入路的技术难度所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号