首页> 外文期刊>Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. >Advantage of Pedicle Screw Placement Into the Sacral Promontory (Tricortical Purchase) on Lumbosacral Fixation
【24h】

Advantage of Pedicle Screw Placement Into the Sacral Promontory (Tricortical Purchase) on Lumbosacral Fixation

机译:在腰ac骨固定中将椎弓根螺钉置入the骨头(三皮质购买)的优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design:Retrospective clinical study.Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcome of the tricortical method for lumbosacral fixation.Summary of Background Data:Despite advances in surgical techniques, failure to achieve solid arthrodesis of the lumbosacral junction continues to be significant clinical problems. To overcome these problems, tricortical purchase fixation has recently been advocated and studied. In this method, a trajectory directly into the medial sacral promontory is used to gain purchase in the dorsal, anterior, and superior cortices. This fixation method has been shown to double the insertional torque of the classic bicortical technique.Methods:Patients who had undergone lumbosacral fixation were included in this study. The average area of fusion was 1.7 segments. The patients were divided into a tricortical fixation group (TF, n=98) and a nontricortical fixation group (non-TF, n=33). We examined clinical outcome [Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system (JOA score)], fusion status, and the characteristics and safety of pedicle screwing in both groups. To identify risk factors for postoperative loss of lordosis (postoperative loss of >5 degrees in L5/S1 disk angle), risk factor analysis was performed by multivariate logistic regression.Results:In TF and non-TF, the JOA score changed from 13.4 and 13.8 points at surgery to 24.9 and 23.8 points, respectively, at final follow-up, and the recovery rate was 73.7% and 64.2%, respectively. Pseudoarthrosis of the fused L5/S1 occurred in 3 patients in whom the lumbosacral spine had not been fixed by tricortical purchase. The screw angle was 22.0 and 16.1 degrees in TF and non-TF, respectively, that is, a significant difference was shown. Significantly fewer TF cases encountered the risk of injured vascular tissue compared with non-TF. Non-TF (OR, 3.37) and correction of the L5/S1 disk angle (OR, 1.11) were significant risk factors for postoperative loss of lordosis.Conclusions:In patients who underwent short-segment lumbosacral fusion, TF enhanced postoperative stability at the lumbosacral junction. Pseudoarthrosis did not occur in patients who underwent TF, and the risk of vascular injury was less. TF is regarded as a successful technique in short-segment lumbosacral fixation.
机译:研究设计:回顾性临床研究。目的:评估腰cor骨固定的三皮质法的临床效果。背景资料摘要:尽管外科技术进步,但腰achieve部结扎术仍无法实现牢固的关节固定术仍然是重大的临床问题。为了克服这些问题,最近已经提倡并研究了三皮质购买固定。在这种方法中,直接进入内侧角的轨迹用于在背,前和上皮层中购买。该固定方法已显示出使经典双皮质技术的插入扭矩增加一倍的方法。方法:本研究包括接受腰s骨固定的患者。融合的平均面积为1.7段。将患者分为三皮质固定组(TF,n = 98)和非皮质固定组(non-TF,n = 33)。我们检查了两组的临床结局[日本骨科协会评分系统(JOA评分)],融合状态以及椎弓根钉的特征和安全性。为了确定术后脊柱前凸丢失的危险因素(L5 / S1椎间盘角度术后丢失> 5度),通过多因素Logistic回归进行了危险因素分析。结果:在TF和非TF中,JOA得分从13.4改变为手术后分别为13.8分和23.8分,最终随访时的恢复率为73.7%和64.2%。融合的L5 / S1假性关节炎发生在3例未通过三皮质购买来固定腰s部脊柱的患者中。 TF和非TF的螺丝角分别为22.0度和16.1度,即显示出显着差异。与非TF相比,发生血管损伤的TF病例明显减少。非TF(OR,3.37)和矫正L5 / S1椎间盘角度(OR,1.11)是术后脊柱前凸丢失的重要危险因素。结论:对于接受短节段腰s骨融合术的患者,TF可以提高术后腰椎稳定性。腰s交界处。进行TF的患者未发生假性关节炎,并且血管损伤的风险较小。 TF被认为是短节段腰s固定术的成功技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号