...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. >Comparative intermediate and long-term results of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.
【24h】

Comparative intermediate and long-term results of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

机译:椎弓根螺钉和钩器械在特发性胸椎侧弯后路矫正和融合中的比较中长期结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively compare the intermediate and long-term results of posterior correction and fusion with segmental pedicle screw instrumentation versus those with hook constructs in idiopathic adolescent thoracic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior correction and fusion represent the current standard surgical treatment in progressive idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. The 3-column fixation of pedicle screws has been shown to be superior to all other posterior spinal fixation devices. METHODS: A total of 168 patients with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at a single institution who underwent a posterior spinal fusion with segmental pedicle screw (88) or a combination of hooks and pedicle screws (80) instrumentation. Patient's evaluation consisted of clinical and radiographic analysis preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up. RESULTS: All patients were prospectively evaluated with an average follow-up of 5 years (range 5 to 11 y). The average number of segments in the fusion was 9.1 (range 6 to 15) in the hook group and 8.5 in the screw group (range 5 to 12). At the final follow-up, the amount of loss of correction in thoracic curves averaged 8.4 in the hook group and 5.3 in the screw group. The difference between the mean postoperative Cobb angle and the final Cobb angle of the major curves with a preoperative value was statistically significant in the 2 groups (P<0.01). The frontal and sagittal plane correction can be satisfactorily obtained by the screw group versus the pedicle screw group. There were no cases of pseudarthrosis, deep wound infections, or any neurologic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory correction and maintenance of scoliotic curves could be obtained by pedicle screw instrumentation compared with hook constructs. Thoracic and thoracolumbar pedicle screw instrumentation is a safe and reliable method for obtaining rigid segmental spinal fixation over the conventional hook and rod.
机译:研究设计:前瞻性队列研究。目的:综合比较节段性椎弓根螺钉器械与钩结构的后路矫正和融合与特发性青春期胸椎侧弯的中长期疗效。背景资料摘要:后路矫正和融合代表了进行性特发性胸椎侧弯的当前标准外科治疗。椎弓根螺钉的三柱固定已被证明优于所有其他后路脊柱固定装置。方法:在单个机构中,共有168例特发性胸椎侧凸患者,他们使用节段椎弓根螺钉(88)或钩钩和椎弓根螺钉(80)组合器械进行了后路脊柱融合术。患者的评估包括术前,术后和最终随访时的临床和影像学分析。结果:所有患者均进行了前瞻性评估,平均随访5年(5至11年)。钩组的融合平均节段数为9.1(6至15),螺钉组为8.5(范围5至12)。在最后的随访中,钩组的胸廓弯曲矫正损失平均为8.4,螺钉组为5.3。两组患者术后平均Cobb角和主要曲线的最终Cobb角之间的差异具有统计学意义(P <0.01)。通过螺钉组相对于椎弓根螺钉组,可以令人满意地获得额面和矢状面的矫正。没有假关节,深部伤口感染或任何神经系统并发症的病例。结论:与钩形结构相比,椎弓根螺钉器械可令人满意地校正和维持脊柱侧弯曲线。胸和胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉器械是一种安全可靠的方法,可以在传统的钩和杆上获得刚性的节段性脊柱固定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号