...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research: JSLHR >Feasibility, efficacy, and social validity of home-based storybook reading intervention for children with language impairment.
【24h】

Feasibility, efficacy, and social validity of home-based storybook reading intervention for children with language impairment.

机译:家庭式故事书阅读干预对语言障碍儿童的可行性,有效性和社会有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and social validity of a parent-implemented intervention for promoting print knowledge in preschoolers with language impairment. METHOD: This trial involved 62 children and their parents. Each dyad completed a 12-week intervention program. Parents in the treatment group implemented print-focused reading sessions; parents in two comparison groups implemented sessions focused on either storybook pictures (picture-focused condition) or phonological concepts (sound-focused condition). RESULTS: Many parents completed the program successfully, but attrition was high; 23% of families dropped out of the program. Children who remained in the treatment group demonstrated significantly greater gains on 1 of 2 measures of print knowledge compared with those in the picture-focused condition but not the sound-focused condition. Parents generally reported favorable impressions of the program, although several aspects of the program received higher ratings from parents in the print-focused group. CONCLUSION: Study results raise questions about the feasibility of home-based intervention for some families; future research that examines the characteristics of families that may affect completion are needed. The causal effects of print-focused reading sessions are promising for addressing children's print-concept knowledge but not alphabet knowledge. Home-based reading intervention has considerable social validity as a therapeutic approach.
机译:目的:本研究评估了家长实施的干预措施在语言障碍学龄前儿童中推广印刷知识的可行性,有效性和社会有效性。方法:该试验涉及62名儿童及其父母。每个二元组都完成了一个为期12周的干预计划。治疗组的父母进行了以阅读为重点的阅读会议;两个比较组的父母实施了针对故事书图片(注重图片的条件)或语音概念(注重声音的条件)的会议。结果:许多父母成功完成了该计划,但损耗率很高。 23%的家庭退出了该计划。留在治疗组中的儿童与以图片为重点的情况相比,在以声音为重点的情况下,在2种印刷知识中有1种表现出明显更大的收益。尽管该计划的几个方面在以印刷为重点的小组中得到了父母的较高评价,但父母总体上对该计划印象良好。结论:研究结果对一些家庭进行家庭干预的可行性提出了质疑。未来需要研究可能影响完成状况的家庭特征的研究。以印刷品为重点的阅读会议的因果效应有望解决儿童的印刷品概念知识,但不能解决字母知识。家庭阅读干预作为治疗方法具有相当大的社会有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号