...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Soil Contamination >Sediment transport modeling: calibration, verification,and evaluation
【24h】

Sediment transport modeling: calibration, verification,and evaluation

机译:泥沙输送模型:标定,验证和评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Numerical modeling of sediment transport in fluvial and estuarine systems can be a reliable way of predicting sediment mobility. If approached naively, however, such modeling can produce results that do not have sufficient accuracy or reliability to be useful in decision making or design regarding a range of remediation or stabilization alternatives. It is important to recognize the numerical modeling process as merely one step toward a more complete and balanced understanding of the fluvial or estuarine system in question. Other steps include qualitative and quantitative geomorphic and engineering analyses used to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of numericalmodeling as part of a three-level approach to analyze sediment mobility and overall channel behavior and trends. It must first be recognized that attempting to quantitatively analyze sediment mobility involves developing and applying simplified mathematical algorithms to the complexities of continually varying hydrodynamic and sediment transport processes through natural or modified bodies of water. Accuracy in sediment modeling can only be assessed by comparing measured data to model results with accuracy being defined as the model results matching the data within some acceptable band of uncertainty. Reliability of a sediment model is the concept of dependability in reproducing the processes one is attempting to model and implies that a model includes appropriate mathematical expressions that cover the pertinent physical processes of hydrodynamics and sediment mobility. The concept of reasonableness in sediment modeling is the evaluation of results, when compared with other independent analyses in the application of the three-level process, provide an acceptable level of consistency and consensus of conclusions. The improtance of modeling software selection, data quality, model calibration, verification, validation, and reasonableness of results are discussed along with two case studies.
机译:河流和河口系统中沉积物迁移的数值模型可以是预测沉积物迁移率的可靠方法。但是,如果天真地采用这种建模方法,则所产生的结果可能没有足够的准确性或可靠性,无法在有关一系列补救或稳定措施的决策或设计中使用。重要的是要认识到数值建模过程仅仅是迈向对河流或河口系统更完整和平衡的理解的一个步骤。其他步骤包括定性和定量地貌和工程分析,用于评估数值建模的准确性和可靠性,这是一种三级方法的一部分,可以分析沉积物的迁移率以及总体航道的行为和趋势。首先必须认识到,试图定量分析沉积物迁移率涉及开发简化的数学算法并将其应用到通过自然或改性水体不断变化的水动力和沉积物输送过程的复杂性。只能通过将测得的数据与模型结果进行比较来评估沉积物建模的准确性,其准确性定义为模型结果与数据在一定可接受范围内匹配。沉积物模型的可靠性是在重现人们试图建模的过程中的可靠性的概念,它表示模型包括涵盖流体力学和沉积物迁移率相关物理过程的适当数学表达式。沉积物建模的合理性概念是对结果的评估,与三级过程的应用中的其他独立分析相比,可以提供可接受水平的结论和共识。结合两个案例研究,讨论了建模软件选择,数据质量,模型校准,验证,确认和结果合理性的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号