...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Shellfish Research >Growth and energy budget models of the bivalve Arctica islandica at six different sites in the northeast Atlantic realm.
【24h】

Growth and energy budget models of the bivalve Arctica islandica at six different sites in the northeast Atlantic realm.

机译:东北大西洋地区六个不同地点的双壳类植物 Arctica islandica 的生长和能量收支模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We compared lifetime and population energy budgets of the extraordinary long-lived ocean quahog Arctica islandica from 6 different sites - the Norwegian coast, Kattegat, Kiel Bay, White Sea, German Bight, and off northeast Iceland - covering a temperature and salinity gradient of 4-10 degrees C (annual mean) and 25-34, respectively. Based on von Bertalanffy growth models and size - mass relationships, we computed organic matter production of body (PSB) and of shell (Pss), whereas gonad production (PG) was estimated from the seasonal cycle in mass. Respiration (R) was computed by a model driven by body mass, temperature, and site. A. islandica populations differed distinctly in maximum life span (40 y in Kiel Bay to 197 y in Iceland), but less in growth performance ( Upsilon ' ranged from 2.41 in the White Sea to 2.65 in Kattegat). Individual lifetime energy throughput, as approximated by assimilation, was highest in Iceland (43,730 kJ) and lowest in the White Sea (313 kJ). Net growth efficiency ranged between 0.251 and 0.348, whereas lifetime energy investment distinctly shifted from somatic to gonad production with increasing life span; Ps/PG decreased from 0.362 (Kiel Bay, 40 y) to 0.031 (Iceland, 197 y). Population annual energy budgets were derived from individual budgets and estimates of population mortality rate (0.035/y in Iceland to 0.173/y in Kiel Bay). Relationships between budget ratios were similar on the population level, albeit with more emphasis on somatic production; PS/Pa ranged from 0.196 (Iceland) to 2.728 (White Sea), and P/B ranged from 0.203-0.285/y. Life span is the principal determinant of the relationship between budget parameters, whereas temperature affects net growth efficiency only. In the White Sea population, both growth performance and net growth efficiency of A. islandica were lowest. We presume that low temperature combined with low salinity represent a particularly stressful environment for this species.
机译:我们比较了来自6个不同地点(挪威海岸,卡特加特海峡,基尔湾,白海,德意志海岸线和冰岛东北部)的非凡长寿命海洋qua(Arctica islandica )的生命周期和人口能源预算温度和盐度梯度分别为4-10摄氏度(年平均值)和25-34。基于von Bertalanffy增长模型和大小-质量关系,我们计算了身体( P SB )和壳( P ss ),而性腺生成( P G )是根据质量的季节周期估算的。呼吸( R )由体重,体温和部位驱动的模型计算得出。 A。 islandica种群的最大寿命明显不同(基尔湾为40岁,冰岛为197岁),但生长性能却有所不同(Upsilon'的范围从白海的2.41到卡特加特河的2.65)。通过同化近似,个体终生的能量通过量在冰岛最高(43,730 kJ),在白海最低(313 kJ)。净增长效率在0.251和0.348之间,而随着寿命的延长,终生能源投资从体细胞生产明显转向性腺生产。 P s / P G 从0.362降低(基尔湾(Yiel Bay)40岁)至0.031(冰岛(197岁))。人口年度能源预算是根据个人预算和人口死亡率估算得出的(冰岛为0.035 / y,基尔湾为0.173 / y)。预算比率之间的关系在人口水平上相似,尽管更多地侧重于躯体生产。 P S / P a 的范围是0.196 (冰岛)至2.728(白海),而 P / B 的范围为0.203-0.285 / y。寿命是预算参数之间关系的主要决定因素,而温度仅影响净增长效率。在白海人口中,A的生长性能和净生长​​效率都很高。 islandica 最低。我们认为低温和低盐度代表了该物种特别紧张的环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号