首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Shellfish Research >The efficiency and selectivity of spring-toothed scallop dredges: a comparison of direct and indirect methods of assessment
【24h】

The efficiency and selectivity of spring-toothed scallop dredges: a comparison of direct and indirect methods of assessment

机译:齿状扇贝挖泥机的效率和选择性:直接和间接评估方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The efficiency and selectivity of spring-toothed scallop dredges was assessed using a concurrent depletion experiment and diver survey of dredge tracks on a north Irish Sea fishing ground. Two size classes of the scallop, Pecten maximus (L. 1758), were examined: below minimum legal landing size (MLLS), (90-109 mm shell length (SL)) and above MLLS (>109 mm SL). Estimates of efficiency from the depletion experiment (24.3 percent and 29.5 percent respectively) were consistently lower than those from the diver surveys (38.0 percent and 40.7 percent respectively). This difference appeared to be due to inherent variation in the efficiency of scallop dredges rather than bias from either technique. This emphasizes the need for error terms to be built intoestimates of dredge efficiency. The diver survey also found that dredges were highly selective toward scallops greater than 90 mm SL, catching only 3.0 percent or less of individuals below this size. Consequently, the diver survey provided a much more accurate assessment of scallop size and age composition than dredge surveys. Dredge efficiency was also assessed for four species of benthic fauna commonly taken as by-catch in the local, fishery. Estimates of efficiency from the depletion experiment werefound to include a considerable amount of indirect fishing mortality. When efficiency was defined as total mortality due to fishing (the combination of catch and indirect fishing mortality), estimates from the depletion experiment and diver surveys werein close agreement. For two species, Luidia ciliaris (Phillipi 1837) and Cancer pagurus (L. 1758), these efficiency or total mortality estimates were approximately 45 percent and 68 percent respectively, emphasizing the impact scallop dredging might have on non-target species. In summary, we recommend that if possible, depletion experiments should be combined with diver surveys when assessing scallop dredge performance. Diver surveys provided additional information on dredge selectivity along with an improved measure of the variance in dredge efficiency estimates.
机译:弹簧齿扇贝挖泥船的效率和选择性是通过同时进行的消耗实验和对北爱尔兰海渔场上挖泥船径的潜水员调查进行评估的。检查了扇贝的两个大小等级,即最大果盘(Lect。max。)(L. 1758):小于最小有效着陆尺寸(MLLS),(90-109 mm壳长(SL))和MLLS(> 109 mm SL)以上。耗竭实验的效率估计值(分别为24.3%和29.5%)始终低于潜水员调查的效率估计值(分别为38.0%和40.7%)。这种差异似乎是由于扇贝挖泥机效率的内在变化而不是任何一种技术的偏差所致。这强调了将误差项内置到挖泥机效率估算中的必要性。潜水员调查还发现,挖泥船对扇贝大于90毫米SL的选择性高,仅捕获了小于或等于3.0%的扇贝。因此,与挖泥船调查相比,潜水员调查对扇贝大小和年龄构成的评估更为准确。还评估了四种底栖动物的疏efficiency效率,这些底栖动物通常在当地渔业中被当作副渔获物。发现耗竭实验的效率估算包括相当数量的间接捕捞死亡率。当将效率定义为捕捞造成的总死亡率(渔获量和间接捕捞死亡率的总和)时,耗竭实验和潜水员调查的估计值非常一致。对于两个物种,即Luidia ciliaris(Phillipi 1837)和Cancer pagurus(L. 1758),这些效率或总死亡率估计分别约为45%和68%,强调了扇贝疏ed对非目标物种的影响。总而言之,我们建议在评估扇贝挖泥性能时,如果可能的话,将消耗实验与潜水员调查相结合。潜水员调查提供了有关挖泥机选择性的更多信息,以及对挖泥机效率估算方差的改进度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号