Hot particle dosimetry and radiobiology - past and present

摘要

Small high-activity radioactive particles of nominal diameter ranging from similar to 1 mm down to several mu m have been a radiological concern over the last 30 years in and around European and American nuclear reactor facilities. These particles have often been referred to as ' hot particles'. The ' hot particle problem' came into prominent concern in the late 1960s. The potential carcinogenic effects in lungs as the result of irradiation by discrete small particles containing alpha- emitting radionuclides, particularly Pu-239, were claimed by some to be several orders of magnitude greater than those produced by uniform irradiation to the same mean dose. The phrase ' hot particle problem' was subsequently used to refer to the difficulty of predicting health effects for all microscopic radioactive sources. The difficulty arose because of the paucity of comparative human, animal or cell studies using radioactive particles, and the lack of validated measurement or calculational techniques for dose estimation for non- uniform exposures. Experience was largely restricted to uniform, large- area/ volume exposures. The concern regarding cancer induction was extended to deterministic effects when the ICRP in 1977 failed to give adequate dose limits for dealing with 'hot particle' exposures of the skin. Since 1980, considerable efforts have been made to clarify and solve the dosimetric and radiobiological issues related to the health effects of 'hot particle' exposures. The general recommendations of the ICRP in 1991 used the latest radiobiological data to provide skin dose limits which are applicable to 'hot particle' exposures. More recently the NCRP has extended considerations to other organs. This progress is reviewed and applied to the specific case of the recent evaluation of potential health effects of Dounreay fuel fragments commissioned by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency ( SEPA). Analyses of possible doses and risks in this case indicate that the principal concern following skin contact, ingestion or inhalation is the possibility of localised ulceration of skin or of the mucosal lining of the colon or extra- thoracic airways.