...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >Effectiveness of integration of palliative medicine specialist services into the intensive care unit of a community teaching hospital
【24h】

Effectiveness of integration of palliative medicine specialist services into the intensive care unit of a community teaching hospital

机译:将姑息治疗专科服务整合到社区教学医院的重症监护室中的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Collaboration between palliative medicine and the intensive care unit (ICU) represents best practice and offers important benefits. However, achieving effective collaboration between these two specialties can be challenging. Objective: Assess effectiveness of integrating palliative medicine specialists in the ICU. Design: Retrospective chart review. Results: Of 201 patients who qualified for palliative consultation using a palliative screening tool, 92 were referred and 109 were not referred for palliative medicine consultation. The number of screening criteria met was similar between the two groups. Palliative medicine consult volume increased significantly compared with preintegration (7.7±3.4 versus 4.4±2.8 consults per month, p=0.04). No significant difference in hospital mortality was found between the referred and unreferred groups (32/92 [35%] versus 26/109 [24%], p=0.09). ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in the referred group (7 versus 11 days, p<0.001). Referred patients were more frequently enrolled in hospice compared with unreferred patients (32/92 [37%] versus 3/109 [3%], p<0.001). ICU physicians referred patients significantly more often for dementia and ventilator withdrawal (13/16, p=0.003; 24/29, p<0.001, respectively) and significantly less often for ICU stay longer than 10 days (21 versus 49, p=0.001). Conclusions: Integrating palliative medicine specialists into intensive care was associated with a significant increase in use of palliative medicine services and a significant decrease in ICU length of stay for referred patients without a significant increase in mortality. The screening tool effectively identified patients at high risk of death. Given the high mortality rate of the unreferred patients, the criteria could be more widely adopted by ICU physicians to consider expanding palliative medicine referrals.
机译:背景:姑息医学与重症监护病房(ICU)之间的合作代表了最佳实践,并提供了重要的好处。但是,要在这两个专业之间实现有效的合作可能是具有挑战性的。目的:评估在ICU中整合姑息医学专家的有效性。设计:回顾性图表审查。结果:在使用姑息筛查工具进行姑息咨询的201例患者中,转诊了92例患者,没有转诊109例。两组符合的筛查标准数量相似。与整合前相比,姑息治疗的医疗咨询量显着增加(每月咨询7.7±3.4对4.4±2.8,p = 0.04)。在转诊组和未转诊组之间,医院死亡率均无显着差异(32/92 [35%]与26/109 [24%],p = 0.09)。转诊组的ICU住院时间明显缩短(7天比11天,p <0.001)。与未转诊的患者相比,转诊的患者入院的频率更高(32/92 [37%]对3/109 [3%],p <0.001)。 ICU医师转诊患者痴呆症和呼吸机撤药的频率显着增加(分别为13/16,p = 0.003; 24/29,p <0.001),而住院时间超过10天的转诊频率显着降低(21 vs 49,p = 0.001 )。结论:将姑息治疗专家纳入重症监护与姑息治疗服务的使用显着增加以及转诊患者的ICU住院时间显着减少而死亡率没有显着增加有关。筛查工具有效地识别出高死亡风险的患者。鉴于未转诊患者的高死亡率,ICU医生可能会更广泛地采用该标准,以考虑扩大姑息治疗转诊的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号