首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >Quality of death and dying in patients who request physician-assisted death.
【24h】

Quality of death and dying in patients who request physician-assisted death.

机译:要求医师协助死亡的患者的死亡和死亡质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Physician-assisted death (PAD) was legalized in 1997 by Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (ODDA). Through 2009, 460 Oregonians have died by lethal prescription under the ODDA. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there was a difference in the quality of the dying experience, from the perspective of family members, between 52 Oregonians who received lethal prescriptions, 34 who requested but did not receive lethal prescriptions, and 63 who did not pursue PAD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. MEASUREMENTS: Family members retrospectively rated the dying experience of their loved one with the 33 item Quality of Death and Dying Questionnaire (QODD). RESULTS: There were differences reported in 9 of the 33 quality item indicators. Few significant differences were noted in items that measured domains of connectedness, transcendence, and overall quality of death. Those receiving PAD prescriptions had higher quality ratings on items measuring symptom control (e.g., control over surroundings and control of bowels/bladder) and higher ratings on items related to preparedness for death (saying goodbye to loved ones, and possession of a means to end life if desired) than those who did not pursue PAD or, in some cases, those who requested but did not receive a lethal prescription. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of death experienced by those who received lethal prescriptions is no worse than those not pursuing PAD, and in some areas it is rated by family members as better.
机译:背景:医师协助死亡(PAD)在1997年通过俄勒冈州的《尊严死亡法》(ODDA)合法化。到2009年,根据ODDA,有460名俄勒冈人死于致命处方。目的:从家庭成员的角度确定垂死经历的质量是否存在差异,其中有52位接受致命处方的俄勒冈人,34位提出但未收到致命处方的俄勒冈人和63位未遵循PAD的美国人。设计:横断面调查。测量:家庭成员使用33项死亡和死亡问卷质量(QODD)来对亲人的死亡经历进行回顾性评估。结果:33个质量项目指标中有9个报告有差异。在测量连通性,超越性和整体死亡质量域的项目中,几乎没有发现显着差异。那些接受PAD处方的人对症状控制项目(例如,对周围环境的控制以及肠/膀胱控制)的质量等级较高,而与死亡准备相关的项目(对亲人说再见,并且拥有终结手段)的等级较高。而不是那些追求PAD的人,或者在某些情况下是那些要求但没有收到致命处方的人。结论:接受致命处方的人的死亡质量并不比不采用PAD的人差,并且在某些方面,其家庭成员认为该质量更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号