首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS >A systematic review of questionnaires to measure the impact of appearance on quality of life for head and neck cancer patients
【24h】

A systematic review of questionnaires to measure the impact of appearance on quality of life for head and neck cancer patients

机译:对问卷进行系统的回顾,以测量外观对头颈癌患者生活质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Facial disfigurement is often experienced by head and neck cancer (HNC) patients following surgery and has a significant impact on their quality of life (QOL). The aim of the current review is to assess patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for use in HNC patients, appraise the psychometric properties of QOL instruments that include an appearance domain and determine which instrument/s might be the most appropriate for use in HNC patients in clinical practice and research. Method: A systematic search of the English-language literature was performed using the Medline and PsycINFO electronic databases. PRO measures designed to assess QOL and the impact of disfigurement on QOL were identified. Instruments were evaluated based on their development and validation criteria, appearance domain content and use in assessing QOL outcomes in HNC patients. Results: From 530 articles, 18 QOL questionnaires were identified. Only five PRO instruments were considered suitable for review: University of Washington QOL questionnaire (UWQOLQ); Head and Neck Survey (HNS); European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35); Derriford Appearance Scale 59 (DAS59) and the Derriford Appearance Scale 24 (DAS24). The UW-QOL has better coverage of appearance issues than the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and the HNS, is well validated and demonstrates promising psychometric properties. The DAS24 and DAS59 which are devoted solely to appearance issues and are not specific to HNC, have had psychometric properties tested in large scale studies, but have only been used in clinical practice in a limited number of studies. Conclusion: The available evidence suggests the UW-QOL is the most appropriate screening tool to assess appearance issues in clinical practice. The DAS24 shows promise as a research tool for improving understanding of how appearance affects QOL in HNC patients.
机译:背景:面部畸形通常发生在术后的头颈癌(HNC)患者中,并对其生活质量(QOL)产生重大影响。当前审查的目的是评估在HNC患者中使用的患者报告结果(PRO)措施,评估包括外观域的QOL仪器的心理测量特性,并确定哪种仪器最适合在HNC中使用患者的临床实践和研究。方法:使用Medline和PsycINFO电子数据库对英语文献进行系统搜索。确定了旨在评估QOL和毁容对QOL的PRO措施。根据器械的开发和验证标准,外观域内容以及用于评估HNC患者的QOL结果来评估器械。结果:从530篇文章中,鉴定出18个QOL问卷。仅五种PRO工具被认为适合审查:华盛顿大学QOL调查表(UWQOLQ);头颈调查(HNS);欧洲研究和治疗癌症生活质量头颈部问卷35(EORTC QLQ-H&N35); Derriford外观量表59(DAS59)和Derriford外观量表24(DAS24)。与EORTC QLQ-H&N35和HNS相比,UW-QOL对外观问题的覆盖范围更好,经过了充分验证,并显示出令人振奋的心理测量特性。 DAS24和DAS59仅用于外观问题,并非特定于HNC,已经在大规模研究中测试了心理测量特性,但仅在有限的研究中用于临床实践。结论:现有证据表明,UW-QOL是评估临床实践中出现问题的最合适的筛查工具。 DAS24有望作为一种研究工具,用于增进对外观如何影响HNC患者的QOL的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号