...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS >Cadaveric comparison of two facial flap-harvesting techniques for alloplastic facial transplantation.
【24h】

Cadaveric comparison of two facial flap-harvesting techniques for alloplastic facial transplantation.

机译:两种异体面部移植的面部皮瓣采集技术的尸体比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Functional and aesthetic reconstruction of severe facial deformities presents a major challenge, and the results are rarely satisfactory. Recent clinical success of composite tissue allograft transplantation and improvements in autoimmune regulation have initiated efforts to reconstruct severe facial deformities with alloplastic tissue. Few reports address the full facial flap dissection approach, where lengthy procedural times remain a limiting factor in achieving optimal graft survival. Extensive vascular anastomoses within facial tissues provide a unique opportunity to explore alternative graft harvesting strategies to optimise operative ischaemia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to shorten donor-graft harvesting time and reduce warm ischaemia. We evaluated alternative facial harvesting strategies through mock cadaveric facial transplantations. METHODS: Cadaveric dissections were performed to explore facial-scalp reconstruction alternatives. Six paired sub-superficial muscloaponeurotic system (SMAS) plane composite facial-scalp flaps were harvested using either a superficial temporal artery (STA) or a facial artery (FA) pedicle technique (Group I) or an external carotid artery (ECA) pedicle technique. Total harvesting times and lengths of vascular pedicles were measured. RESULTS: Harvesting time for a STA and FA pedicle total facial flap (mean=113min, range=105-120min, SD=6min) was shorter than that for an ECA pedicle flap (mean=232min, range=225-240min, SD=6min) (P<0.01). Mean pedicle lengths for the STA, the FA, the ECA, the external jugular vein, and the facial vein were 37+/-2.1, 35+/-1.8, 26+/-1.4, 52+/-3.0 and 42+/-2.6mm, respectively. Mean pedicle lengths for the supraorbital, supratrochlear, infraorbital, mental, and facial nerve were 15+/-1.5, 14+/-1.4, 24+/-1.2, 30+/-1.6 and 32+/-1.8mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with previously reported ECA pedicle total facial allograft harvesting techniques, an STA and FA pedicle flap provides a shorter harvesting timeand potentially safer dissection method for facial transplantation by avoiding interference with the complicated anatomy of the carotid and submental triangle. Early graft ischaemic damage can be minimised by this harvesting technique, which significantly shortens harvesting time compared with previously described approaches, while maintaining adequate full facial perfusion.
机译:背景:严重的面部畸形的功能和美学重建是一项重大挑战,其结果很少令人满意。复合组织同种异体移植的最新临床成功以及自身免疫调节的改善,已开始努力重建具有异体增生组织的严重面部畸形。很少有报道涉及面部全皮瓣剥离方法,其中漫长的手术时间仍然是实现最佳移植物存活的限制因素。面部组织内广泛的血管吻合提供了一个独特的机会来探索替代性的移植物收获策略,以优化手术缺血。目的:本研究的目的是缩短供体移植物的收获时间并减少温暖的局部缺血。我们通过模拟尸体面部移植评估了替代性面部收获策略。方法:进行尸体解剖以探索面部头皮重建的替代方法。使用颞浅动脉(STA)或面部动脉(FA)椎弓根技术(I组)或颈外动脉(ECA)椎弓根技术,收获六对成对的肌肉下皮神经系统表面(SMAS)平面复合头皮皮瓣。测量总的收获时间和血管蒂的长度。结果:STA和FA蒂蒂全面部皮瓣的收获时间(平均= 113min,范围= 105-120min,SD = 6min)比ECA蒂蒂皮瓣的收获时间(平均= 232min,范围= 225-240min,SD = 6分钟)(P <0.01)。 STA,FA,ECA,颈外静脉和面静脉的平均椎弓根长度为37 +/- 2.1、35 +/- 1.8、26 +/- 1.4、52 +/- 3.0和42 + / -2.6mm。眶上,上睑上,眶下,精神和面部神经的平均椎弓根长度分别为15 +/- 1.5、14 +/- 1.4、24 +/- 1.2、30 +/- 1.6和32 +/- 1.8mm。结论:与以前报道的ECA椎弓根全脸异体移植技术相比,STA和FA椎弓根皮瓣通过避免干扰颈动脉和下颌三角形的复杂解剖结构,为面部移植提供了更短的收获时间和更安全的解剖方法。可以通过这种收获技术将早期的移植物缺血性损害降至最低,与先前描述的方法相比,这可以大大缩短收获时间,同时保持足够的全脸灌注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号