...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS >In vivo observations of cell trafficking in allotransplanted vascularized skin flaps and conventional skin grafts.
【24h】

In vivo observations of cell trafficking in allotransplanted vascularized skin flaps and conventional skin grafts.

机译:异体移植血管化皮瓣和常规皮肤移植物中细胞运输的体内观察。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The problem of allogeneic skin rejection is a major limitation to more widespread application of clinical composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA). Previous research examining skin rejection has mainly studied rejection of conventional skin grafts (CSG) using standard histological techniques. The aim of this study was to objectively assess if there were differences in the immune response to CSG and primarily vascularized skin in composite tissue allotransplants (SCTT) using in vivo techniques in order to gain new insights in to the immune response to skin allotransplants. CSG and SCTT were transplanted from standard Lewis (LEW) ad Wistar Furth (WF) to recipient transgenic green fluorescent Lewis rats (LEW-GFP). In vivo confocal microscopy was used to observe cell trafficking within skin of the transplants. In addition, immunohistochemical staining was performed on skin biopsies to reveal possible expression of class II major histocompatibility antigens. A difference was observed in the immune response to SCTT compared to CSG. SCTT had a greater density cellular infiltrate than CSG (p<0.03) that was focused more at the center of the transplant (p<0.05) than at the edges, likely due to the immediate vascularization of the skin. Recipient dendritic cells were only observed in rejecting SCTT, not CSG. Furthermore, dermal endothelial class II MHC expression was only observed in allogeneic SCTT. The immune response in both SCTT and CSG was focused on targets in the dermis, with infiltrating cells clustering around hair follicles (CSG and SCTT; p<0.01) and blood vessels (SCTT; p<0.01) in allogeneic transplants. This study suggests that there are significant differences between rejection of SCTT and CSG that may limit the relevance of much of the historical data on skin graft rejection when applied to composite tissue allotransplantation. Furthermore, the use of novel in vivo techniques identified characteristics of the immune response to allograft skin not previously described, which may be useful in directing future approaches to overcoming allograft skin rejection.
机译:异体皮肤排斥的问题是临床复合组织同种异体移植(CTA)的更广泛应用的主要限制。先前研究皮肤排斥的研究主要是使用标准组织学技术研究常规皮肤移植物(CSG)的排斥。这项研究的目的是使用体内技术客观地评估复合组织同种异体移植(SCTT)中对CSG和主要是血管化皮肤的免疫反应是否存在差异,从而获得对同种异体皮肤免疫反应的新见解。将CSG和SCTT从标准Lewis(LEW)和Wistar Furth(WF)移植到受体转基因绿色荧光Lewis大鼠(LEW-GFP)中。体内共聚焦显微镜用于观察移植皮肤内的细胞运输。另外,对皮肤活检进行免疫组织化学染色以揭示II类主要组织相容性抗原的可能表达。与CSG相比,观察到的对SCTT的免疫反应有所不同。 SCTT的细胞浸润密度高于CSG(p <0.03),后者集中在移植物的中心(p <0.05)而不是边缘,这可能是由于皮肤的立即血管形成。仅在拒绝SCTT而非CSG时观察到受体树突状细胞。此外,仅在同种异体SCTT中观察到了II型MHC真皮内皮表达。 SCTT和CSG的免疫反应都集中在真皮的靶标上,同种异体移植中浸润细胞聚集在毛囊(CSG和SCTT; p <0.01)和血管(SCTT; p <0.01)周围。这项研究表明,SCTT和CSG排斥之间存在显着差异,这可能会限制许多历史数据在将皮肤移植排斥应用于复合组织同种异体移植时的相关性。此外,使用新的体内技术鉴定了先前未描述的对同种异体皮肤的免疫应答的特征,这可能在指导将来克服同种异体皮肤排斥的方法中有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号