...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS >Outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review.
【24h】

Outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review.

机译:使用无细胞真皮基质重建腹壁后的结果:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall defects can present a significant challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. In 2003, acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was introduced as an alternative to synthetic materials with suggestions that it has improved capacity to integrate with surrounding tissues with less inclination towards infection, erosion, extrusion, adhesion formation and rejection compared with synthetic materials. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the existing literature describing the use of ADM for abdominal wall reconstruction in an attempt to identify factors that may affect outcomes. METHODS: A review of the MEDLINE database using the search terms 'dermal matrix' and 'abdomen' or 'hernia' for prospective and retrospective human studies in English was performed. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, case reports, reviews and articles that dealt only with ADM for repair of congenital abdominal wall defects, hiatal, parastomal or inguinal hernias and enterocutaneous fistulae. Two independent reviewers performed the systematic review with the same a priori criteria, with discrepancies reconciled by the senior author. RESULTS: In October 2010, 3394 articles were identified as potentially inclusive based on the search term 'dermal matrix'. When filtered for 'abdomen' or 'hernia', 83 articles were found. Ultimately, 30 articles met criteria. No other systematic reviews, meta-analyses or randomised controlled trials were identified in the existing literature. CONCLUSIONS: At this current time, there is a paucity of high-level evidence comparing ADM with other methods interfering with the ability of physicians to make data-driven recommendations on clinical indications, surgical techniques and outcomes following ADM-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction.
机译:背景:复杂的腹壁缺损可能给重建外科医师带来重大挑战。 2003年,引入无细胞真皮基质(ADM)作为合成材料的替代品,并提出与合成材料相比,它具有增强的与周围组织融合的能力,并且对感染,侵蚀,挤压,黏附形成和排斥的倾向较小。进行该系统评价以评估描述ADM用于腹壁重建的现有文献,以试图确定可能影响预后的因素。方法:使用搜索词“真皮基质”和“腹部”或“疝气”对MEDLINE数据库进行了回顾,以进行英语的前瞻性和回顾性人体研究。排除标准为动物研究,病例报告,评论和仅涉及ADM修复先天性腹壁缺损,食管裂孔,口旁或腹股沟疝,腹股沟疝和肠内皮肤瘘管的文章。两名独立的审稿人以相同的先验标准进行了系统的审阅,其中差异由高级作者调和。结果:2010年10月,基于搜索词“真皮基质”将3394篇文章确定为具有潜在包容性。当过滤掉“腹部”或“疝气”时,发现了83篇文章。最终,有30篇文章符合标准。现有文献中未发现其他系统评价,荟萃分析或随机对照试验。结论:目前,尚无大量的高级证据将ADM与其他方法进行比较,从而干扰了医生在ADM辅助腹壁重建后就临床适应症,手术技术和结果提出以数据为依据的建议的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号