首页> 外文期刊>Journal of postgraduate medicine >Reporting of various methodological and statistical parameters in negative studies published in prominent Indian Medical Journals: A systematic review
【24h】

Reporting of various methodological and statistical parameters in negative studies published in prominent Indian Medical Journals: A systematic review

机译:在著名的印度医学杂志上发表的阴性研究中各种方法和统计参数的报告:系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Biased negative studies not only reflect poor research effort but also have an impact on ′patient care′ as they prevent further research with similar objectives, leading to potential research areas remaining unexplored. Hence, published ′negative studies′ should be methodologically strong. All parameters that may help a reader to judge validity of results and conclusions should be reported in published negative studies. There is a paucity of data on reporting of statistical and methodological parameters in negative studies published in Indian Medical Journals. The present systematic review was designed with an aim to critically evaluate negative studies published in prominent Indian Medical Journals for reporting of statistical and methodological parameters. Design: Systematic review. Materials and Methods: All negative studies published in 15 Science Citation Indexed (SCI) medical journals published from India were included in present study. Investigators involved in the study evaluated all negative studies for the reporting of various parameters. Primary endpoints were reporting of ?power? and ?confidence interval.? Results: Power was reported in 11.8% studies. Confidence interval was reported in 15.7% studies. Majority of parameters like sample size calculation (13.2%), type of sampling method (50.8%), name of statistical tests (49.1%), adjustment of multiple endpoints (1%), post hoc power calculation (2.1%) were reported poorly. Frequency of reporting was more in clinical trials as compared to other study designs and in journals having impact factor more than 1 as compared to journals having impact factor less than 1. Conclusion: Negative studies published in prominent Indian medical journals do not report statistical and methodological parameters adequately and this may create problems in the critical appraisal of findings reported in these journals by its readers.
机译:目标:偏向阴性研究不仅反映了研究工作不力,而且对“患者护理”产生了影响,因为它们阻止了具有相似目标的进一步研究,从而导致潜在的研究领域尚未开发。因此,已发表的“阴性研究”在方法论上应该很强大。所有可能有助于读者判断结果和结论是否正确的参数都应在已发表的阴性研究中报告。在印度医学杂志上发表的负面研究中,缺乏统计和方法学参数报告的数据。本系统综述旨在严格评估在著名的印度医学杂志上发表的用于报告统计和方法学参数的阴性研究。设计:系统审查。材料和方法:本研究包括在印度出版的15种科学引文索引(SCI)医学期刊上发表的所有阴性研究。参与研究的研究人员评估了所有阴性研究的各种参数报告。主要终点报告为“力量”?和“置信区间”。结果:在11.8%的研究中报告了功率。在15.7%的研究中报告了置信区间。报告的大多数参数,如样本量计算(13.2%),抽样方法类型(50.8%),统计检验名称(49.1%),多个端点的调整(1%),事后功效计算(2.1%),报告得很少。与其他研究设计相比,在临床试验中报告频率更高,在影响因子大于1的期刊中,与影响因子小于1的期刊相比,报告的频率更高。结论:在印度著名医学期刊上发表的阴性研究没有报告统计学和方法论适当地设置参数,这可能会在读者对这些期刊报道的发现进行严格评估时产生问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号