首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Rural development and the regional state: denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK.
【24h】

Rural development and the regional state: denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK.

机译:农村发展与地区状况:拒绝英国的多功能农业。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Under the emerging rural development paradigm, we argue that to be multifunctional an activity must add income to agriculture, it must contribute to the construction of a new agricultural sector that corresponds to the needs of the wider society and it must reconfigure rural resources in ways that lead to wider rural development benefits. By evaluating UK rural policies on the basis of whether or not they attempt to meet these conditions, this paper shows that an implicit recognition of agriculture's multifunctional character has occurred recently through the shift from a sectoral to a regional and territorial perspective that reintegrates farming into rural development. However, in practice, and especially in England, the UK government has been unable to turn multifunctional activities into a real rural development option. In fact, by continuing to support agri-industrial/retailer interests on the one hand, and post-productivist - environmental and amenity - interests on the other, the State is governing mostly by setting up competitively organized 'projects' and schemes that continue to justify the concentration (and limitation) of resources allocated to agriculture. Based upon a critique of policy developments over the past decade, this paper emphasizes the need for more innovative forms of state innovation that provide opportunities for new, creative and more spatially embedded forms of supply and demand management in agri-food. In the conclusions, the paper also argues that more critical research is needed to uncover the existing and potential role of both governments and producer networks in progressing sustainable rural development through agricultural multifunctionality.
机译:在新兴的农村发展范式下,我们认为,一项活动要多功能,就必须增加农业收入,它必须为建设一个与更广泛的社会相对应的新农业部门做出贡献,并且必须以某种方式重新配置农村资源。带来更广泛的农村发展利益。通过根据英国农村政策是否尝试满足这些条件来对其进行评估,本文表明,通过从部门视角转变为地区视角,使农业重新融入农村,对农业的多功能性有了隐性认识发展。但是,实际上,特别是在英格兰,英国政府一直无法将多功能活动变成真正的农村发展选择。实际上,国家一方面继续支持农业工业/零售商的利益,另一方面又支持生产后主义的利益(环境和舒适性),因此主要通过建立竞争性组织的“项目”和计划来继续执政。证明分配给农业的资源集中(和限制)是合理的。基于对过去十年政策发展的批判,本文强调了对国家创新的更多创新形式的需求,这些创新形式为农业食品中的供求管理提供了新的,创造性的和更多空间嵌入形式的机会。在结论中,该论文还指出,需要开展更多批判性研究,以揭示政府和生产者网络在通过农业多功能性促进农村可持续发展方面的现有和潜在作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号