首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Community-based agricultural land consolidation and local elites: Survey evidence from China
【24h】

Community-based agricultural land consolidation and local elites: Survey evidence from China

机译:社区农业土地整理和地方精英:来自中国的调查证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Land consolidation is an essential aspect of rural restructuring in China. Community-based agricultural land consolidation projects were developed to restructure the agricultural sector by pooling fragmented land and leasing it as consolidated plots or employing laborers to farm the land. Despite the rapid growth in the number of villages that generally adopt the approach, the relative amount of farmland managed under the program remains low, and empirical studies explaining this variation are scarce. We investigate the drivers of land coverage under the program with a particular interest in the role of local elites and village characteristics. Using primary data from 120 villages in Suzhou City and Yangzhou City, China, our study shows that projects led by government officials achieve greater coverage. Other local elites do not play an important role in the process. Further investigation indicates that the roles of different types of elites change over time. We also find that structural village characteristics such as distance to town, village land endowment, and off-farm market participation substantially affect project outcomes. The results are robust to different samples and different specifications of the econometric model. Rather than generally excluding elites from leadership positions, policymakers should actively promote certain types of elites whose involvement might be critical for project success. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:土地整理是中国农村结构调整的重要方面。开发了以社区为基础的农业土地整理项目,以通过合并零散的土地并将其作为综合土地出租或雇用劳工来耕种土地来重组农业部门。尽管通常采用该方法的村庄数量迅速增长,但该计划管理的耕地相对数量仍然较低,并且缺乏解释这种差异的经验研究。我们调查了该计划下土地覆盖的驱动力,并对当地精英和乡村特色的作用特别感兴趣。利用来自中国苏州市和扬州市的120个村庄的原始数据,我们的研究表明,由政府官员领导的项目覆盖面更大。其他地方精英在此过程中不发挥重要作用。进一步的研究表明,不同类型的精英角色随着时间而变化。我们还发现,村庄的结构性特征,例如到城镇的距离,村庄的土地end赋和非农市场的参与,都大大影响了项目的成果。结果对计量经济学模型的不同样本和不同规格具有鲁棒性。政策制定者应该积极地培养某些类型的精英,这些精英的参与可能对项目的成功至关重要,而不是将精英排除在领导职位之外。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号