首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Residuals Science & Technology >Inherent error and dangers of 'once-in-a-lifetime' exposure limits
【24h】

Inherent error and dangers of 'once-in-a-lifetime' exposure limits

机译:固有错误和“一生一次”暴露限值的危险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Various organizations and agencies have proposed inhalation levels of toxic chemicals that may be experienced with negligible health risks on a once-in-a-lifetime exposure basis. Many of the chemicals for which such exposure levels have been defined are present in any given area on a regular basis, which means there are chronic as well as acute exposures to consider. Others represent repeated exposures for emergency response personnel because of multiple release incidents from the same source, or multiple sources in the area. Additionally, special risks of high level acute exposures such as cancer initiators vs. cancer promoters may have been ignored. The inherent error and dangers are illustrated by specific cases of arsenic, benzene, mercury, and vinyl chloride. It is recommended that no "minimal risk" or "safe" exposure levels for emergency response personnel or the general public should ever be promulgated that are less protective than the most conservative short-term exposure limits for the workplace.
机译:各种组织和机构已经提出了有毒化学物质的吸入量,可能以一生一次的暴露为基础,其健康风险可以忽略不计。已定义暴露水平的许多化学药品定期存在于任何给定区域,这意味着需要考虑慢性和急性暴露。其他代表紧急反应人员的重复暴露,因为来自同一来源或该地区的多个来源的多次释放事件。另外,可能会忽略高水平急性暴露的特殊风险,例如癌症引发剂与癌症引发剂。砷,苯,汞和氯乙烯的具体情况说明了固有的错误和危险。建议不要发布紧急响应人员或公众的“最低风险”或“安全”暴露水平,其防护水平不如工作场所最保守的短期暴露限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号