...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of rehabilitation medicine : >Coping strategy use: does it predict adjustment to chronic back pain after controlling for catastrophic thinking and self-efficacy for pain control?
【24h】

Coping strategy use: does it predict adjustment to chronic back pain after controlling for catastrophic thinking and self-efficacy for pain control?

机译:应对策略的使用:在控制灾难性思维和控制疼痛的自我效能之后,它是否可以预测对慢性背痛的适应?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether coping strategy use predicted levels of adjustment in chronic low back pain after controlling for the influence of catastrophic thinking and self-efficacy for pain control. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with chronic low back pain completed the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, a pain VAS and the Roland Disability Questionnaire. To derive composite measures of coping, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire subscales, excluding the Catastrophizing subscale and 2 single-item scales, were entered into a principal components analysis. The extent to which scores on the coping measures predicted levels of adjustment after controlling for catastrophic thinking (Catastrophizing subscale) and self-efficacy for pain control (2 single-item scales) was explored using sequential multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Two coping dimensions emerged from the principal components analysis, which were labelled Distraction and Praying or Hoping, and Denial of Pain and Persistence. Scores obtainedon these coping measures explained an additional 5% and 13% of the variance in pain intensity and disability, respectively. Interestingly, however, the scores on the coping measures did not predict pain intensity or disability after controlling for the influence of catastrophic thinking and self-efficacy for pain control. CONCLUSION: Coping strategy use might only be related to levels of adjustment via the effect it has on catastrophic thinking and self-efficacy for pain control.
机译:目的:探讨应对策略在控制灾难性思维和自我效能控制疼痛的影响后,是否使用预测的慢性下腰痛调整水平。方法:84名慢性下腰痛患者完成了应对策略问卷,疼痛VAS和罗兰残疾问卷。为了获得综合的应对措施,将应对策略问卷子量表(不包括灾难性子量表和2个单项量表)纳入主成分分析。使用序贯多元回归分析探讨了应对措施的分数预测了控制灾难性思维(灾难性子量表)和自我控制疼痛的自我效能(2个单项量表)后的调整水平。结果:从主成分分析中得出了两个应对维度,分别是分心,祈祷或希望,否认痛苦和坚持。这些应对措施获得的分数分别解释了疼痛强度和残疾差异的另外5%和13%。然而,有趣的是,应对措施的分数在控制了灾难性思维和控制疼痛的自我效能的影响之后,并未预测疼痛的强度或残疾。结论:应对策略的使用可能仅通过其对灾难性思维和控制疼痛的自我效能的影响而与调整水平有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号