首页> 外文期刊>Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology >Use of health, education, and social services by individuals with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder
【24h】

Use of health, education, and social services by individuals with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder

机译:胎儿酒精谱异常患者使用健康,教育和社会服务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is the leading cause of intellectual disability in western society, presenting a significant burden on health, education and social services. Quantifying the burden of FASD is important for service planning and policy and program development. Objective To describe the health, education and social service use of individuals with FASD to provide an indication of the burden of service use of the disorder. Methods Using a matched-cohort design health, education and social service data were linked with clinical records on individuals 6+ years diagnosed with FASD between 1999/2000-2009/10 (N=717). Matching was 2:1 with a general population (gPop) and asthma group by age, sex and area-level income. Adjusted rates and relative risks were calculated using Generalized Linear Models. Results Hospitalizations were higher in the FASD compared to gPop (adjusted relative risk=3.44 (95% confidence interval=2.29, 5.17)) and asthma (2.87 (1.94, 4.25)) groups, whereas for physician visits and overall prescriptions, the FASD group differed from only the gPop group (1.58 (1.34, 1.84); 1.44 (1.22, 1.72), respectively). Antibiotics, pain killers and anti-psychotics were similar across groups whereas antidepressants and psychostimulants were higher in the FASD group (antidepressants: FASD vs. gPop 8.76 (2.82, 27.21); FASD vs. asthma 2.10 (1.15, 3.83); psychostimulants: FASD vs. gPop 5.78 (2.89, 11.57); FASD vs. asthma 2.47 (1.37, 4.47)). Attention-deficithyperactivity disorder was higher in the FASD than the gPop and asthma groups (6.41 (3.29, 12.49); 3.12 (1.97, 4.93), respectively). Education and social service use was higher for the FASD than either of the other groups for all measures (FASD vs. gPop and FASD vs. asthma, respectively for: grade repetition 3.06 (1.58, 5.94); 3.48 (1.79, 6.78); receipt of any special education funding 9.22 (6.23, 13.64); 6.10 (4.14, 8.99); family receipt of income assistance 1.74 (1.33, 2.27); 1.89 (1.45, 2.47); child in care 13.19 (5.84, 29.78);10.70 (4.80, 23.88); and receipt of child welfare services 5.70 (4.21, 7.71); 4.94 (3.67, 6.66)). Conclusion The health, education and social service utilization burden of individuals with FASD is substantial, greater than that of individuals in the general population and with chronic illness (i.e., asthma). The findings highlight the need for multisystem supports for those with FASD, and comprehensive prevention programs.
机译:背景技术胎儿酒精频谱疾病(FASD)是西方社会智障的主要原因,给健康,教育和社会服务带来了沉重负担。量化FASD的负担对于服务计划以及政策和计划制定很重要。目的描述FASD患者的健康,教育和社会服务使用情况,以指示该疾病的服务使用负担。方法使用配对队列设计,将1999 / 2000-2009 / 10年间诊断为FASD的6年以上个体的健康,教育和社会服务数据与临床记录相关联(N = 717)。年龄,性别和地区收入与一般人群(gPop)和哮喘组的匹配率为2:1。使用广义线性模型计算调整后的利率和相对风险。结果FASD组的住院率高于gPop组(调整后的相对危险度= 3.44(95%可信区间= 2.29,5.17))和哮喘组(2.87(1.94,4.25)),而就医和整体处方而言,FASD组仅与gPop组不同(分别为1.58(1.34,1.84); 1.44(1.22,1.72))。各组间的抗生素,止痛药和抗精神病药相似,而FASD组的抗抑郁药和精神刺激药则更高(抗抑郁药:FASD vs. gPop 8.76(2.82,27.21); FASD vs.哮喘2.10(1.15,3.83);精神兴奋剂:FASD vs. gPop 5.78(2.89,11.57); FASD vs.哮喘2.47(1.37,4.47))。 FASD中的注意缺陷/多动障碍患病率高于gPop组和哮喘组(分别为6.41(3.29,12.49); 3.12(1.97,4.93))。在所有指标上,FASD的教育和社会服务使用均高于其他两组(FASD对gPop和FASD对哮喘),分别是:年级重复3.06(1.58,5.94); 3.48(1.79,6.78);收据特殊教育资金的9.22(6.23,13.64); 6.10(4.14,8.99);家庭收入补助金1.74(1.33,2.27); 1.89(1.45,2.47);育儿中的孩子13.19(5.84,29.78); 10.70( 4.80,23.88);儿童福利服务的收据5.70(4.21,7.71); 4.94(3.67,6.66))。结论FASD患者的健康,教育和社会服务利用负担是巨大的,比普通人群和慢性病(哮喘)患者要大。研究结果突出表明,对于那些患有FASD的人以及全面的预防计划,需要多系统支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号