...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering >On the use of Wireline Formation Testing (WFT) data: 2. Consequences of permeability anisotropy and heterogeneity on the WFT responses inferred flow modeling
【24h】

On the use of Wireline Formation Testing (WFT) data: 2. Consequences of permeability anisotropy and heterogeneity on the WFT responses inferred flow modeling

机译:关于使用电缆形成测试(WFT)数据:2.渗透率各向异性和非均质性对WFT响应流动模型的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

WET rests are commonly performed to sample fluids and to assess the formation pressures in reservoirs at different depths. The interpretation of these pressure values provides the fluid gradients and the location of the interfaces between these fluids. The WET data analysis can also be used to assess mobility values from the drawdown, the buildup or both, based on analytical solutions of the diffusivity equation initially developed for the well test analysis. Various publications, comparing the permeability values derived from WET data with plug measurements, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) interpretation, and log modeling, have shown that a good match is infrequently obtained. For most authors, the discrepancy between permeability values could be related to either the uncertainly on fluid viscosity or the permeability anisotropy.
机译:通常进行WET静置来取样流体并评估不同深度储层中的地层压力。这些压力值的解释提供了流体梯度和这些流体之间的界面位置。 WET数据分析还可以基于最初为试井分析而开发的扩散方程的解析解,来评估水位下降,构造或两者的迁移率值。各种出版物将WET数据得出的磁导率值与塞子测量,核磁共振(NMR)解释和测井模型进行了比较,显示很少能获得良好的匹配。对于大多数作者而言,渗透率值之间的差异可能与流体粘度的不确定性或渗透率各向异性有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号